From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-100296-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6309 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2004 09:40:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6283 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jun 2004 09:40:49 -0000
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:40:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040621094049.6278.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pluto at pld-linux dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040621084809.16109.pluto@pld-linux.org>
References: <20040621084809.16109.pluto@pld-linux.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/16109] error: architecture mismatch on "fzero".
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg02588.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org  2004-06-21 09:40 -------
(In reply to comment #3) 
> The list is not complete, it lacks 'asm_arch' and 'asm_relax'. 
>  
 
*asm_arch32: 
-32 
 
*asm_arch64: 
-64 -no-undeclared-regs 
 
*asm_relax: 
%{!mno-relax:-relax} 
 
*asm_arch_default: 
-64 -no-undeclared-regs 
 
*asm_arch: 
%{m32:%(asm_arch32)} %{m64:%(asm_arch64)} %{!m32:%{!m64:%(asm_arch_default)}} 
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16109