From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14607 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2004 06:25:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14580 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2004 06:25:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040630062543.14579.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jbglaw at lug-owl dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040517103549.15491.gabucino@mplayerhq.hu> References: <20040517103549.15491.gabucino@mplayerhq.hu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/15491] ICE (Internal compiler error) while compiling glibc to vax-linux target X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg03893.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jbglaw at lug-owl dot de 2004-06-30 06:25 ------- Subject: Re: ICE (Internal compiler error) while compiling glibc to vax-linux target On Wed, 2004-06-30 02:55:52 -0000, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote in message <20040630025552.9449.qmail@sourceware.org>: > > ------- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-30 02:55 ------- > > At least, it looks even a bit better and does make some sense:) For now, > > I don't think that cycle costs are the largest problem for VAX (the VAX > > backend was even mentioned to be removed completely...). > > I wasn't too concerned about the cost calculation. If the code fragment > doesn't fix the original problem, can you try in gdb > > p debug_rtx (x) > > so that we can see in more detail the rtx that caused the problem? It > might be necessary to break on vax_rtx_costs_1 with x==0x40273ea0 and > step though the routine. A good first introduction into GCC debugging:) Thanks. Any chance to organize some hacker's meeting in Europe to let you teach first steps in GCC hacking? Maybe you'd come over to the Oldenburger Linuxtag's Kernel Hacker's meeting (mostly Linux), that would take care for proper audience. MfG, JBG -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15491