public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] New: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
@ 2004-07-04 0:22 jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-04 0:23 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] " jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-04 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
This test has failed for a while, but I can't find a bug report on it, so I'm
adding one here.
The test execute/va-arg-25.c with the -Os option compiles, but fails with a
runtime abort with gcc 3.4.0, gcc 3.4.1, and the trunk.
With gcc 3.3.4, the test causes an ICE, with the message
internal compiler error: in ix86_function_arg_boundary, at config/i386/i386.c:2444
gcc 3.2.3 fails to compile the test because the vector support
needed is not present.
To repeat:
gcc -Os <dir>/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c
a.out
I guess this isn't a regression, as I can't find a version that works.
I'm guessing "rtl-optimization" because only -Os fails; don't trust that guess.
--
Summary: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16354
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
2004-07-04 0:22 [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] New: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686 jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-04 0:23 ` jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-04 0:33 ` [Bug target/16354] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-04 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4
| |3.4.0 3.4.1 3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16354
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16354] va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
2004-07-04 0:22 [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] New: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686 jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-04 0:23 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] " jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-04 0:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-04 0:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-04 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-04 00:33 -------
Confirmed, the reason why it fails on i686 at -Os only is because of this code:
/* Validate -mpreferred-stack-boundary= value, or provide default.
The default of 128 bits is for Pentium III's SSE __m128, but we
don't want additional code to keep the stack aligned when
optimizing for code size. */
ix86_preferred_stack_boundary = (optimize_size
? TARGET_64BIT ? 128 : 32
: 128);
So the problem is has to do with alignment problems on the stack and I know I have seen this bug
before too.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|rtl-optimization |target
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-07-04 00:33:39
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16354
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16354] va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
2004-07-04 0:22 [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] New: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686 jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-04 0:23 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] " jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-04 0:33 ` [Bug target/16354] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-04 0:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-12 12:31 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-04 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-04 00:36 -------
Yes I commented in PR 15617 about the same exact problem and in fact I said var_arg25.c when I had
meant va-arg-25.c.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15617 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16354
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16354] va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
2004-07-04 0:22 [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] New: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686 jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-04 0:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-12 12:31 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-12 12:32 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-12 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-12 12:31 -------
Not a duplicate of PR 15617, since PR 15617 is still not fixed...
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16354
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16354] va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
2004-07-04 0:22 [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] New: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686 jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-12 12:31 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-12 12:32 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-12 22:42 ` jbuck at welsh-buck dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-12 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-12 12:32 -------
... but this one is.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16354
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16354] va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
2004-07-04 0:22 [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] New: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686 jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-12 12:32 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-12 22:42 ` jbuck at welsh-buck dot org
2004-07-13 9:46 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jbuck at welsh-buck dot org @ 2004-07-12 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jbuck at welsh-buck dot org 2004-07-12 22:42 -------
Subject: Re: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
You say this is fixed, but I still get the abort from last night's build
of both 3.4 branch and trunk. Was it fixed in the last 12 hours?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16354
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16354] va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
2004-07-04 0:22 [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] New: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686 jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-12 22:42 ` jbuck at welsh-buck dot org
@ 2004-07-13 9:46 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-13 9:47 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-18 15:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-13 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-13 09:46 -------
According to Andrew this was fixed on mainline by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-07/msg00525.html
I get clean test results from tonight's build.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16354
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16354] va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
2004-07-04 0:22 [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] New: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686 jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-13 9:46 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-13 9:47 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-18 15:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-13 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Known to fail|3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 |3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4
|3.4.0 3.4.1 3.5.0 |3.4.0 3.4.1
Known to work| |3.5.0
Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16354
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16354] va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686
2004-07-04 0:22 [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] New: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686 jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-13 9:47 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-18 15:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-18 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 04:44 -------
*** Bug 20050 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |giftbound at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16354
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-18 4:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-04 0:22 [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] New: va-arg-25.c -Os regression fails on i686 jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-04 0:23 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/16354] " jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-04 0:33 ` [Bug target/16354] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-04 0:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-12 12:31 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-12 12:32 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-12 22:42 ` jbuck at welsh-buck dot org
2004-07-13 9:46 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-13 9:47 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-18 15:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).