public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ak at muc dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/16362] New: i386/x86-64 backend missing logical vector operations Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 19:34:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20040704193415.16362.ak@muc.de> (raw) The vectorization test suite currently has a few failures that happen because i386 is missing patterns for logical vector operations. Altivec got these recently. > This means the i386 backend needs new patterns for logical operations > like you added to altivec.md ? I suspect so. > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa-vect/tree-ssa-vect-17.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 3 loops 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa-vect/tree-ssa-vect-18.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 3 loops 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa-vect/tree-ssa-vect-19.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 3 loops 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa-vect/tree-ssa-vect-20.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 3 loops 1 bitwise operations - may need to add new patterns to i*86 (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg00907.html). -- Summary: i386/x86-64 backend missing logical vector operations Product: gcc Version: lno Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ak at muc dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: i?86-*-*, x86_64-*-* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16362
next reply other threads:[~2004-07-04 19:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-07-04 19:34 ak at muc dot de [this message] 2004-07-04 19:35 ` [Bug target/16362] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-12 6:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20040704193415.16362.ak@muc.de \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).