From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20990 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2004 01:04:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20978 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jul 2004 01:04:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 01:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040707010404.20975.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040617025326.16030.dannysmith@users.sourceforge.net> References: <20040617025326.16030.dannysmith@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/16030] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00551.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-07-07 01:04 ------- Patch submitted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00534.html -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch Summary|[cygwin/mingw]: stdcall |[cygwin/mingw]: stdcall |function decoration vs |function decoration vs |LTHUNK alias in multiple |LTHUNK alias in multiple |inheritanc |inheritanc http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030