public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/16400] New: Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected
@ 2004-07-07 6:51 lei at il dot ibm dot com
2004-07-07 15:54 ` [Bug fortran/16400] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: lei at il dot ibm dot com @ 2004-07-07 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The following code should trigger an error message (currently
accepted).
subroutine foo(s)
integer s(*)
s = 1
print*, s
end
The 2003 Standard says in 5.1.2.5.4: "...An assumed-size
array name shall not be written as a whole array reference
except as an actual argument in a procedure reference for which
the shape is not required."
--
Summary: Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 3.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: lei at il dot ibm dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16400
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/16400] Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected 2004-07-07 6:51 [Bug fortran/16400] New: Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected lei at il dot ibm dot com @ 2004-07-07 15:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-07 15:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (5 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-07 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-07 15:54 ------- Confirmed. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-07-07 15:54:27 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16400 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/16400] Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected 2004-07-07 6:51 [Bug fortran/16400] New: Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected lei at il dot ibm dot com 2004-07-07 15:54 ` [Bug fortran/16400] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-07 15:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-11 14:58 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-07 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16400 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/16400] Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected 2004-07-07 6:51 [Bug fortran/16400] New: Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected lei at il dot ibm dot com 2004-07-07 15:54 ` [Bug fortran/16400] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-07 15:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-11 14:58 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-12 6:55 ` lei at il dot ibm dot com ` (3 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-11 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-11 14:58 ------- The Fortran 95 (draft) standard continues that sentence "or in a reference to the intrinsic function LBOUND." (p 56, line 26). Is that not in the F2K standard? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16400 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/16400] Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected 2004-07-07 6:51 [Bug fortran/16400] New: Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected lei at il dot ibm dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2004-07-11 14:58 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-12 6:55 ` lei at il dot ibm dot com 2004-09-01 21:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: lei at il dot ibm dot com @ 2004-07-12 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From lei at il dot ibm dot com 2004-07-12 06:55 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > The Fortran 95 (draft) standard continues that sentence "or in a reference to > the intrinsic function LBOUND." (p 56, line 26). Is that not in the F2K standard? My understanding is that LBOUND is just an example of a function that is always allowed for assumed-size arrays. UBOUND is allowed except for the last dimension. SIZE and SHAPE are not allowed because assumed-size arrays have no upper bound in last dimension. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16400 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/16400] Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected 2004-07-07 6:51 [Bug fortran/16400] New: Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected lei at il dot ibm dot com ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2004-07-12 6:55 ` lei at il dot ibm dot com @ 2004-09-01 21:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-01 21:08 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-01 21:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-01 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-01 21:07 ------- Subject: Bug 16400 CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc Module name: gcc Changes by: tobi@gcc.gnu.org 2004-09-01 21:07:39 Modified files: gcc/fortran : ChangeLog resolve.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: der_io_1.f90 Log message: fortran/ PR fortran/16400 PR fortran/16404 (port from g95) * resolve.c (resolve_transfer): New function. (resolve_code): Call resolve_transfer in case of EXEC_TRANSFER. testsuite/ PR fortran/16404 * gfortran.dg/der_io_1.f90: XFAIL illegal testcase. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.195&r2=1.196 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/resolve.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.16&r2=1.17 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4228&r2=1.4229 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/der_io_1.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.2&r2=1.3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16400 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/16400] Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected 2004-07-07 6:51 [Bug fortran/16400] New: Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected lei at il dot ibm dot com ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2004-09-01 21:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-01 21:08 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-01 21:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-01 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-01 21:08 ------- Fixed. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16400 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/16400] Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected 2004-07-07 6:51 [Bug fortran/16400] New: Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected lei at il dot ibm dot com ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2004-09-01 21:08 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-01 21:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-01 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16400 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-01 21:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-07-07 6:51 [Bug fortran/16400] New: Invalid usage of assumed-size arrays is not rejected lei at il dot ibm dot com 2004-07-07 15:54 ` [Bug fortran/16400] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-07 15:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-11 14:58 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-12 6:55 ` lei at il dot ibm dot com 2004-09-01 21:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-01 21:08 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-01 21:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).