From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-102370-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11287 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2004 18:36:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11275 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jul 2004 18:36:29 -0000
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:36:00 -0000
From: "tempa at enigmati dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20040707183626.16413.tempa@enigmati.ca>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/16413] New: 3.3 regression: operator() of private member accessible
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00665.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

The following simple code snippet is correctly rejected by versions 2.95 and
3.2, but is accepted by 3.3:


class A
{
public:
    int operator()(int i) const { return 0; }
};

class B
{
private:
    A a;
};

int main()
{
        return B().a(0);
}



This happens with both const and non-const operator(), but doesn't seem to
happen with other operators. I tried += and operator[], which both correctly
generated errors.

-- 
           Summary: 3.3 regression: operator() of private member accessible
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: tempa at enigmati dot ca
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16413