From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23498 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2004 23:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23484 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jul 2004 23:49:21 -0000 Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 23:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040709234921.23483.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040709202544.16460.drepper@redhat.com> References: <20040709202544.16460.drepper@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/16460] [3.5 Regression] ICE when compiling glibc (ld-ctype.c) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00992.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-09 23:49 ------- Confirmed but I have not reduced the testcase yet. /* We have missing edge in the callgraph. This can happen in one case where previous inlining turned indirect call into direct call by constant propagating arguments. In all other cases we hit a bug (incorrect node sharing is most common reason for missing edges. */ if (!dest->needed) abort (); -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |critical Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Summary|ICE when compiling glibc |[3.5 Regression] ICE when |(ld-ctype.c) |compiling glibc (ld-ctype.c) Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16460