From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-102843-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12360 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2004 13:49:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12351 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jul 2004 13:49:34 -0000
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:49:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040711134934.12350.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040707093303.16404.jv244@cam.ac.uk>
References: <20040707093303.16404.jv244@cam.ac.uk>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/16404] should reject invalid code with -pedantic -std=f95 ? (x8)
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg01138.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-07-11 13:49 -------
I can't find anything in the standard which renders test 6 illegal. I think the
code is equivalent to:
! test 6
MODULE TEST
  TYPE, PRIVATE :: info_type
   private
   INTEGER :: value
  END TYPE info_type
  TYPE, PUBLIC :: all_type
    private
    TYPE(info_type) :: info
  END TYPE
END MODULE
which is legal AFAICT, and accepted by gfortran.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16404