* [Bug fortran/16499] ice-on-valid-code, seg-fault
2004-07-12 15:54 [Bug fortran/16499] New: ice-on-valid-code, seg-fault c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
@ 2004-07-12 15:56 ` c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
2004-07-12 16:21 ` [Bug fortran/16499] ICE with character declaration reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de @ 2004-07-12 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2004-07-12 15:56 -------
Created an attachment (id=6734)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6734&action=view)
Reduced testcase from Unidata's netCDF distro, version 3.5.1, f90 module
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16499
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/16499] ICE with character declaration
2004-07-12 15:54 [Bug fortran/16499] New: ice-on-valid-code, seg-fault c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
2004-07-12 15:56 ` [Bug fortran/16499] " c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
@ 2004-07-12 16:21 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-12 19:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-12 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-12 16:21 -------
Confirmed. Here's an even shorter testcase that segfaults:
=================================================
subroutine foo(x)
character (len = *), dimension(:) :: x
call bar(x)
end subroutine foo
=================================================
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-07-12 16:21:13
date| |
Summary|ice-on-valid-code, seg-fault|ICE with character
| |declaration
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16499
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/16499] ICE with character declaration
2004-07-12 15:54 [Bug fortran/16499] New: ice-on-valid-code, seg-fault c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
2004-07-12 15:56 ` [Bug fortran/16499] " c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
2004-07-12 16:21 ` [Bug fortran/16499] ICE with character declaration reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-12 19:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-16 9:53 ` c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-12 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-12 19:30 -------
This is a dup of bug 15324.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15324 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16499
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/16499] ICE with character declaration
2004-07-12 15:54 [Bug fortran/16499] New: ice-on-valid-code, seg-fault c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-12 19:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-16 9:53 ` c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
2004-07-16 12:58 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-19 8:07 ` c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de @ 2004-07-16 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2004-07-16 09:53 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> This is a dup of bug 15324.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15324 ***
Reopened, both testcases keep producing ICE with current gfortran:
gcc version 3.5.0 20040715 (experimental)
(am I missing something here?)
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16499
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/16499] ICE with character declaration
2004-07-12 15:54 [Bug fortran/16499] New: ice-on-valid-code, seg-fault c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-16 9:53 ` c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
@ 2004-07-16 12:58 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-19 8:07 ` c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-16 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-16 12:58 -------
On 16 Jul, c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de wrote:
> Reopened, both testcases keep producing ICE with current gfortran:
>
> gcc version 3.5.0 20040715 (experimental)
>
> (am I missing something here?)
Probably ;-)
The patches for the PR went into CVS yesterday afternoon (15:02:17 UTC
to be precise). And you are using a compiler built yesterday. Are you
sure the patches really made it into your compiler?
I doubt that, since the bug is fixed for me with a compiler built tonight.
Could you please retry with a more recent built?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16499
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/16499] ICE with character declaration
2004-07-12 15:54 [Bug fortran/16499] New: ice-on-valid-code, seg-fault c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-16 12:58 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-19 8:07 ` c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de @ 2004-07-19 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2004-07-19 08:07 -------
that's weird, I checked that version out on 07-16 around 10:00 am, maybe a
mirror fault? Well, anyway, a recent version of gfortran
(using the one of 07-19) does not exhibit this bug anymore, changed status back
to DUP of PR 15324
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15324 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16499
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread