From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9114 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2004 21:48:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9101 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jul 2004 21:48:16 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 21:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040713214816.9099.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040707093303.16404.jv244@cam.ac.uk> References: <20040707093303.16404.jv244@cam.ac.uk> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/16404] should reject invalid code with -pedantic -std=f95 ? (x8) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg01647.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-13 21:48 ------- Patch for No 1 is here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-07/msg00163.html Joost, if you're planning to submit such bugs in the future, it would be helpful if you pointed why you think those cases are illegal. It would have saved me some time, at least when investigating number 6; and in number 8 it's not apparent to me which part of the standard is violated, so I will to have search through it, work which you certainly have done already. Even your compiler's error message could be helpful in that regard. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16404