* [Bug tree-optimization/16543] internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314
2004-07-14 16:48 [Bug tree-optimization/16543] New: internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314 selecter at spray dot se
@ 2004-07-14 16:49 ` selecter at spray dot se
2004-07-14 16:53 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/16543] [new-ra] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: selecter at spray dot se @ 2004-07-14 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From selecter at spray dot se 2004-07-14 16:49 -------
Created an attachment (id=6743)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6743&action=view)
Preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16543
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/16543] [new-ra] internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314
2004-07-14 16:48 [Bug tree-optimization/16543] New: internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314 selecter at spray dot se
2004-07-14 16:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/16543] " selecter at spray dot se
@ 2004-07-14 16:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-14 17:01 ` selecter at spray dot se
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-14 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-14 16:53 -------
Yes do not use -fnew-ra. As this option is documented as experimental so do not use it unless you
know what you are doing.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |minor
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[new-ra] internal compiler
|remember_web_was_spilled, at|error: in
|ra-build.c:2314 |remember_web_was_spilled, at
| |ra-build.c:2314
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16543
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/16543] [new-ra] internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314
2004-07-14 16:48 [Bug tree-optimization/16543] New: internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314 selecter at spray dot se
2004-07-14 16:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/16543] " selecter at spray dot se
2004-07-14 16:53 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/16543] [new-ra] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-14 17:01 ` selecter at spray dot se
2004-07-14 17:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: selecter at spray dot se @ 2004-07-14 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From selecter at spray dot se 2004-07-14 17:01 -------
I will use -fnew-ra anyway, so would you mind I'll continue bugreporting? I just
don't understand.
I have 2 more left: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57023 and
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57025
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16543
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/16543] [new-ra] internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314
2004-07-14 16:48 [Bug tree-optimization/16543] New: internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314 selecter at spray dot se
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-14 17:01 ` selecter at spray dot se
@ 2004-07-14 17:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-14 17:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-14 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |matz at suse dot de
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16543
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/16543] [new-ra] internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314
2004-07-14 16:48 [Bug tree-optimization/16543] New: internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314 selecter at spray dot se
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-14 17:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-14 17:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-14 17:13 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-01-17 15:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-14 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-14 17:04 -------
Suspending until either new-regalloc branch is merged to mainline, or bug is rechecked against
new-regalloc branch.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16543
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/16543] [new-ra] internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314
2004-07-14 16:48 [Bug tree-optimization/16543] New: internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314 selecter at spray dot se
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-14 17:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-14 17:13 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-01-17 15:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-07-14 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-07-14 17:13 -------
Yes, please continue reporting bugs, but be prepared that they may
not be fixed for a long while. Development of new-ra seems to continue
only on a branch, so these bugs will not be fixed in releases before that
branch is merged. Nobody knows when (if ever) this is going to happen.
Until then, we will just suspend these bugs, but we will recheck them
before the branch is merged.
Thanks
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16543
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/16543] [new-ra] internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314
2004-07-14 16:48 [Bug tree-optimization/16543] New: internal compiler error: in remember_web_was_spilled, at ra-build.c:2314 selecter at spray dot se
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-14 17:13 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2005-01-17 15:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-17 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-17 15:22 -------
Closing as wiill not fix as new-ra was removed from the mainline.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16543
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread