[Bug c++/16560] New: error with inner class declaring operator=

[Bug c++/16560] New: error with inner class declaring operator=

[larsbj at lyx dot org]

This snippet works with gcc 3.3 and 3.4, but fails on 3.5.

g++ (GCC) 3.5.0 20040715 (experimental)

class Foo {};

class Bar : public Foo {
public:
	struct Item {
		Item & operator=(Item const &);
	};
};


g++ -c test.C -o test.o
test.C:3: error: declaration of `Bar& Bar::operator=(const Bar&)'
test.C:1: error: conflicts with previous declaration `Foo& Foo::operator=(const
Foo&)'


Please tell if you need the preprocessed sources.

-- 
           Summary: error with inner class declaring operator=
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: larsbj at lyx dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16560

[Bug c++/16560] error with inner class declaring operator=

[larsbj at lyx dot org]

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|                            |3.5.0
      Known to work|                            |3.3.3 3.4.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16560

[Bug c++/16560] error with inner class declaring operator=

[bangerth at dealii dot org]

------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2004-07-15 11:51 -------
Confirmed. Note that the compiler error refers to the operator= in class 
Bar, not Bar::Item. If one removes the declaration in Bar::Item, then the 
error message goes away. It looks as if someone was looking up a name in 
the wrong scope. 
 
Mark, could this be related to your push_/pop_* work? 
 
W. 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
           Severity|normal                      |critical
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-07-15 11:52:04
               date|                            |
   Target Milestone|---                         |3.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16560

[Bug c++/16560] [3.5 Regression] error with inner class declaring operator=

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-07-15 14:16 -------
Guess what I saw something like this when compiling QT also.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid
            Summary|error with inner class      |[3.5 Regression] error with
                   |declaring operator=         |inner class declaring
                   |                            |operator=


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16560

[Bug c++/16560] [3.5 Regression] error with inner class declaring operator=

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-07-15 16:02 -------
I failed to check in the name-lookup.c changes that I posted here:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg01493.html

Those changes fix this problem.

I've now applied that patch.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16560