From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2550 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2004 20:33:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2543 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2004 20:33:49 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 20:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040716203349.2542.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "wilson at specifixinc dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040716120316.16588.nitins2@kpitcummins.com> References: <20040716120316.16588.nitins2@kpitcummins.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/16588] H8 / SH X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg02044.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-07-16 20:33 ------- Subject: Re: New: H8 / SH nitins2 at kpitcummins dot com wrote: > removed `build-newlib-1.12.0/h8300-elf/h8sx/int32/newlib/libm/config.status' > removed `build-newlib-1.12.0/h8300-elf/h8sx/int32/newlib/libm/Makefile' > /home/kpit/fsfsrc/downloads/newlib-1.12.0/newlib/libc/sys/sh/syscalls.c:9: > error: register name not specified for 'stack_ptr' This seems confused. The first two lines are from an h8300 build, and the last two lines are from an sh build. I am wondering if you did something wrong in your configure/build process. But since you have given us no info about this, I can't comment further. You mention that there are two targets, but give only one error message. I'd expect different error messages for these two targets in this case, so this seems confused also. This is just as likely a newlib problem as a gcc problem, and we don't handle newlib problems here. You need to prove this is a gcc problem if you want us to do something with it. You can't prove that without a testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16588