* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
@ 2004-07-19 10:59 ` wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
2004-07-19 13:40 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: wenzel at tu-harburg dot de @ 2004-07-19 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From wenzel at tu-harburg dot de 2004-07-19 10:59 -------
Created an attachment (id=6779)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6779&action=view)
Testcase, now syntactically correct
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
2004-07-19 10:59 ` [Bug c++/16625] " wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
@ 2004-07-19 13:40 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-07-19 17:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-07-19 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-07-19 13:40 -------
A patch which uses comdat group is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg01047.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
2004-07-19 10:59 ` [Bug c++/16625] " wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
2004-07-19 13:40 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-07-19 17:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-01 9:31 ` schwab at suse dot de
` (17 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-19 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-19 17:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-01 9:31 ` schwab at suse dot de
2004-08-01 9:33 ` schwab at suse dot de
` (16 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2004-08-01 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-08-01 09:31 -------
*** Bug 16849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |schwab at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-01 9:31 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2004-08-01 9:33 ` schwab at suse dot de
2004-08-01 15:10 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (15 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2004-08-01 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-08-01 09:33 -------
Bug 16849 has a much simpler test case.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |matz at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-01 9:33 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2004-08-01 15:10 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-01 16:16 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-08-01 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-08-01 15:10 -------
Confirmed by Andreas then. As already noted, PR 16849 has a clearer description
and smaller testcase.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-08-01 15:10:16
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-01 15:10 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-08-01 16:16 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-08-07 16:41 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-08-01 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-08-01 16:16 -------
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg01047.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-01 16:16 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-08-07 16:41 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-08-25 7:33 ` andrew at walrond dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-08-07 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-08-07 16:41 -------
Another bug report:
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=310
Could someone please comment on my patch? I'd like to see it in mainline,
3.3 and 3.4.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mark at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-07 16:41 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-08-25 7:33 ` andrew at walrond dot org
2004-08-27 11:34 ` andrew at walrond dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: andrew at walrond dot org @ 2004-08-25 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andrew at walrond dot org 2004-08-25 07:33 -------
> Could someone please comment on my patch? I'd like to see it in mainline,
> 3.3 and 3.4.
SECONDED and REMINDER
Important packages, notably Mozilla/Thunderbird/Firefox cannot be built with
3.3.4 or 3.4.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-25 7:33 ` andrew at walrond dot org
@ 2004-08-27 11:34 ` andrew at walrond dot org
2004-11-17 16:59 ` gustavo dot boiko at kdemail dot net
` (10 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: andrew at walrond dot org @ 2004-08-27 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andrew at walrond dot org 2004-08-27 11:33 -------
> Could someone please comment on my patch? I'd like to see it in mainline,
> 3.3 and 3.4.
With your patch applied to gcc3.4.1, previously broken builds of
Mozilla/thunderbird firefox are now working.
But I am seeing similar looking problems (and failure) building Kdegraphics-
3.3.0
/bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX g++ -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-
long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -
Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -O2 -
Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -
fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -
DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -o libkpovmodeler.la -rpath /pkg/kde.1/lib -
L/pkg/x11.1/lib -L/pkg/qt.1/lib -L/pkg/kde.1/lib -version-info 0:0:0 -no-
undefined -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,--allow-shlib-undefined -
R/pkg/freetype2.1/lib pmpart.lo pmfactory.lo pmview.lo pmshell.lo
pmobjectdrag.lo pmtreeview.lo pmmessage.lo pmtreeviewitem.lo pmerrordialog.lo
pminsertpopup.lo pminserterrordialog.lo pmglview.lo pmrendermanager.lo
pmobjectselect.lo pmrendermodesdialog.lo pmpovrayrenderwidget.lo
pmpovraywidget.lo pmpovrayoutputwidget.lo pmsettingsdialog.lo
pmcolorsettings.lo pmgridsettings.lo pmlayoutsettings.lo
pmobjectlibrarysettings.lo pmobjectsettings.lo pmpluginsettings.lo
pmpovraysettings.lo pmpreviewsettings.lo pmopenglsettings.lo pmdockwidget.lo
pmdockwidget_private.lo pmviewlayoutmanager.lo pmviewbase.lo pmviewfactory.lo
pmunknownview.lo pmdragwidget.lo pmprototypemanager.lo pmobject.lo
pmcompositeobject.lo pmgraphicalobject.lo pmsolidobject.lo pmscene.lo
pmglobalsettings.lo pmskysphere.lo pmrainbow.lo pmfog.lo pmbox.lo pmsphere.lo
pmblob.lo pmblobsphere.lo pmblobcylinder.lo pmtext.lo pmjuliafractal.lo
pmcylinder.lo pmcone.lo pmtorus.lo pmplane.lo pmpolynom.lo pmdisc.lo
pmbicubicpatch.lo pmtriangle.lo pmlathe.lo pmprism.lo pmsor.lo pmsqe.lo
pmheightfield.lo pmheightfieldroam.lo pmcomment.lo pmraw.lo pmnamedobject.lo
pmtranslate.lo pmscale.lo pmrotate.lo pmpovraymatrix.lo pmcsg.lo pmcamera.lo
pmboundedby.lo pmclippedby.lo pmlight.lo pmlookslike.lo pmprojectedthrough.lo
pmtexturebase.lo pmtexture.lo pmpigment.lo pmsolidcolor.lo pmlistpattern.lo
pmquickcolor.lo pmpattern.lo pmblendmapmodifiers.lo pmtexturemap.lo
pmnormal.lo pmslope.lo pmwarp.lo pmfinish.lo pminterior.lo pmmedia.lo
pmmaterial.lo pmmaterialmap.lo pmdensity.lo pmimagemap.lo pmbumpmap.lo
pmisosurface.lo pmradiosity.lo pmglobalphotons.lo pmphotons.lo pmlightgroup.lo
pminteriortexture.lo pmspheresweep.lo pmmesh.lo pmdeclare.lo pmobjectlink.lo
pmrecursiveobjectiterator.lo pmaddcommand.lo pmcommandmanager.lo
pmdatachangecommand.lo pmdeletecommand.lo pmmovecommand.lo pmdialogview.lo
pmdialogeditbase.lo pmgraphicalobjectedit.lo pmnamedobjectedit.lo
pmsolidobjectedit.lo pmskysphereedit.lo pmglobalsettingsedit.lo
pmrainbowedit.lo pmfogedit.lo pmboxedit.lo pmsphereedit.lo pmblobedit.lo
pmblobsphereedit.lo pmblobcylinderedit.lo pmtextedit.lo pmjuliafractaledit.lo
pmcylinderedit.lo pmconeedit.lo pmtorusedit.lo pmplaneedit.lo pmpolynomedit.lo
pmheightfieldedit.lo pmlatheedit.lo pmprismedit.lo pmsoredit.lo pmsqeedit.lo
pmdiscedit.lo pmbicubicpatchedit.lo pmtriangleedit.lo pmcommentedit.lo
pmrawedit.lo pmrotateedit.lo pmscaleedit.lo pmtranslateedit.lo
pmpovraymatrixedit.lo pmcsgedit.lo pmcameraedit.lo pmlightedit.lo
pmboundedbyedit.lo pmclippedbyedit.lo pmlineedits.lo pmvectorlistedit.lo
pmcoloredit.lo pmlinkedit.lo pmvectoredit.lo pmpalettevalueedit.lo
pmformulalabel.lo pmtexturebaseedit.lo pmtextureedit.lo pmpigmentedit.lo
pmsolidcoloredit.lo pmlistpatternedit.lo pmquickcoloredit.lo pmpatternedit.lo
pmblendmapmodifiersedit.lo pmimagemapedit.lo pmtexturemapedit.lo
pmbumpmapedit.lo pmmaterialmapedit.lo pmnormaledit.lo pmslopeedit.lo
pmfinishedit.lo pmwarpedit.lo pminterioredit.lo pmmediaedit.lo
pmmaterialedit.lo pmdensityedit.lo pmdeclareedit.lo pmobjectlinkedit.lo
pmisosurfaceedit.lo pmradiosityedit.lo pmglobalphotonsedit.lo pmphotonsedit.lo
pmlightgroupedit.lo pminteriortextureedit.lo pmspheresweepedit.lo
pmmeshedit.lo pmcontrolpoint.lo pm3dcontrolpoint.lo pm2dcontrolpoint.lo
pmsorcontrolpoint.lo pmtranslatecontrolpoint.lo pmrotatecontrolpoint.lo
pmscalecontrolpoint.lo pmvectorcontrolpoint.lo pmdistancecontrolpoint.lo
pmplanenormalcontrolpoint.lo pmmemento.lo pmmapmemento.lo pmsplinememento.lo
pmprismmemento.lo pmpalettevaluememento.lo pmiomanager.lo pmpovrayformat.lo
pmpovray31format.lo pmpovray35format.lo pmpovray31serialization.lo
pmpovray35serialization.lo pmscanner.lo pmparser.lo pmxmlparser.lo
pmpovrayparser.lo pmserializer.lo pmoutputdevice.lo pmxmlhelper.lo
pmfiledialog.lo pmpalettevalue.lo pmvector.lo pmmath.lo pmmatrix.lo
pmviewstructure.lo pmline.lo pmcolor.lo pmpoint.lo pmsymboltable.lo
pmactions.lo pmsplinesegment.lo pmsorsegment.lo pmpolynomexponents.lo
pmvariant.lo pmmetaobject.lo pmenumproperty.lo pmrendermode.lo
pmresourcelocator.lo pmtruetypecache.lo pmdocumentationmap.lo
pminsertrulesystem.lo pmlibrarymanager.lo pmlibraryhandle.lo
pmlibraryhandleedit.lo pmlibraryobject.lo pmlibraryentrypreview.lo
pmlibrarybrowser.lo pmlibraryiconview.lo pmlibraryobjectsearch.lo
pmpluginmanager.lo pmpartiface_skel.lo -L/pkg/freetype2.1/lib -lfreetype -lz -
lkparts -lGLU -lGL -lX11 -lXmu -lXi
`.L82' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12setProtectedEP8PMObjectRK9PMVariant'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
`.L85' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12setProtectedEP8PMObjectRK9PMVariant'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
`.L88' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12setProtectedEP8PMObjectRK9PMVariant'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
`.L91' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12setProtectedEP8PMObjectRK9PMVariant'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
`.L94' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12setProtectedEP8PMObjectRK9PMVariant'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
`.L97' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12setProtectedEP8PMObjectRK9PMVariant'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
`.L106' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12setProtectedEP8PMObjectRK9PMVariant'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
`.L109' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12setProtectedEP8PMObjectRK9PMVariant'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
`.L112' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12setProtectedEP8PMObjectRK9PMVariant'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
`.L130' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12getProtectedEPK8PMObject'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
`.L133' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12getProtectedEPK8PMObject'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
`.L136' referenced in section `.rodata' of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o: defined
in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10PMProperty12getProtectedEPK8PMObject'
of .libs/pmgraphicalobject.o
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-27 11:34 ` andrew at walrond dot org
@ 2004-11-17 16:59 ` gustavo dot boiko at kdemail dot net
2004-11-23 9:19 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: gustavo dot boiko at kdemail dot net @ 2004-11-17 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gustavo dot boiko at kdemail dot net 2004-11-17 16:59 -------
any news on this problem? I've seen some problems like this one in
OpenOffice.org cvs HEAD compilation with gcc-3.4.3 because of some inlined
class methods at the cppu and the xmlscript modules.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gustavo dot boiko at kdemail
| |dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-17 16:59 ` gustavo dot boiko at kdemail dot net
@ 2004-11-23 9:19 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
2004-11-23 16:40 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: trapni at gentoo dot org @ 2004-11-23 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From trapni at gentoo dot org 2004-11-23 09:19 -------
I'm having the (NEARLY?) same problem, using gcc 3.4.3
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
`typeinfo for CodeDOM::TAttribute'referenced in section
`.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTVN7CodeDOM10TAttributeE' of .libs/TAttribute.o: defined in
discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTIN7CodeDOM10TAttributeE'
of .libs/TAttribute.o
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
`typeinfo for CodeDOM::TAttribute'referenced in section
`.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTVN7CodeDOM10TAttributeE' of .libs/TAttribute.o: defined in
discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTIN7CodeDOM10TAttributeE'
of .libs/TAttribute.o
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
`typeinfo for CodeDOM::TAttribute'referenced in section
`.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTVN7CodeDOM10TAttributeE' of .libs/TAttribute.o: defined in
discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTIN7CodeDOM10TAttributeE'
of .libs/TAttribute.o
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
`typeinfo for CodeDOM::TParamSym' referenced in section
`.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTIPN7CodeDOM9TParamSymE' of .libs/TCastDef.o: defined in
discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTIN7CodeDOM9TParamSymE'
of .libs/TParamSym.o
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
`typeinfo for CodeDOM::TClassDef' referenced in section `.text'
of .libs/TClassName.o: defined in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTIN7CodeDOM9TClassDefE' of .libs/TClassDef.o
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: BFD
2.15.92.0.2 20040927 internal error, aborting at elf32-i386.c line 2224 in
elf_i386_relocate_section
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
Please report this bug.
I first thought it would be a bug in binutils (ld), because he complained
about.
Is there any wayt to code around this bug? I'm forced to stop coding until this
is fixed :(((
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trapni at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-23 9:19 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
@ 2004-11-23 16:40 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-11-24 2:59 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-11-23 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-23 16:40 -------
Please try the Linux binutils 2.15.94.0.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-23 16:40 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-11-24 2:59 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
2004-11-24 3:19 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: trapni at gentoo dot org @ 2004-11-24 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From trapni at gentoo dot org 2004-11-24 02:59 -------
As a workaround, I just created a MyLibrary_all.cpp that
#include'd all the .cpp files existing in this lib. this
obviousely linked and I could work as usual (nearly)..
However, I'm testing 2.15.94.0.1 now :) maybe thix fixes it.
thanks,
Christian Parpart.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-24 2:59 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
@ 2004-11-24 3:19 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
2004-11-24 7:01 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: trapni at gentoo dot org @ 2004-11-24 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From trapni at gentoo dot org 2004-11-24 03:19 -------
Well, no. it doesn't work with that binutils:
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
`typeinfo for CodeDOM::TClassDef' referenced in section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZNK6System13Serialization18TSerializationInfo15getStrictObjectIN7CodeDOM9TClassDefEEEPT_RKNS_11TStringBaseIcEE'
of .libs/TAttribute.o: defined in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTIN7CodeDOM9TClassDefE'
of ./.libs/libCodeDOM_def.a(TClassDef.o)
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: BFD
2.15.94.0.1 20041121 internal error, aborting
at /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.15.94.0.1/work/binutils-2.15.94.0.1/bfd/elf32-i386.c
line 2224 in elf_i386_relocate_section
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
Please report this bug.
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
I would like to reproduce this within a little 2-file demo
if would just know WTF this bug raises.
I guess, giving you my sources doesn't help, does it? in
order to find the bug, I mean.
Greets,
Christian Parpart.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-24 3:19 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
@ 2004-11-24 7:01 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-11-24 7:35 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-11-24 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-24 07:01 -------
This is a compiler bug. I am not sure how much linker can help here. A
sel-contained testcase is needed to take a look at it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-24 7:01 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-11-24 7:35 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
2004-11-24 14:38 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: trapni at gentoo dot org @ 2004-11-24 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From trapni at gentoo dot org 2004-11-24 07:35 -------
Yeah, but I really do not know how to reproduce this bug, as the source code is
really too much to say, line X is guilty.
well, but what's "sel-contained"?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-24 7:35 ` trapni at gentoo dot org
@ 2004-11-24 14:38 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-12-09 17:54 ` brian dot morey at atk dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-11-24 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-24 14:38 -------
I don't mind a big testcase as long as it is all I need on a regular Linux
installation.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-24 14:38 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-12-09 17:54 ` brian dot morey at atk dot com
2005-06-27 14:31 ` marc dot price at rd dot bbc dot co dot uk
2005-08-30 8:58 ` markus dot glaser at daimlerchrysler dot com
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: brian dot morey at atk dot com @ 2004-12-09 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From brian dot morey at atk dot com 2004-12-09 17:54 -------
I am having this same issue with my code. It's too large to commit but I will
try and make a smaller test case out of it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-09 17:54 ` brian dot morey at atk dot com
@ 2005-06-27 14:31 ` marc dot price at rd dot bbc dot co dot uk
2005-08-30 8:58 ` markus dot glaser at daimlerchrysler dot com
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: marc dot price at rd dot bbc dot co dot uk @ 2005-06-27 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From marc dot price at rd dot bbc dot co dot uk 2005-06-27 14:31 -------
Has this bug been fixed yet? Would really like to upgrade my linux box, but
can't because this bug prevents me from compiling a vital suite of software.
Can we bump-up the priority?
TIA
Marc
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
2004-07-19 10:59 [Bug c++/16625] New: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata wenzel at tu-harburg dot de
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-27 14:31 ` marc dot price at rd dot bbc dot co dot uk
@ 2005-08-30 8:58 ` markus dot glaser at daimlerchrysler dot com
20 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: markus dot glaser at daimlerchrysler dot com @ 2005-08-30 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From markus dot glaser at daimlerchrysler dot com 2005-08-30 08:23 -------
also, not working with gcc-3.3.5, tested with linkoncedebug-0.0.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-25 11:46 ` hidden_peak at mail dot ru
2005-11-18 18:19 ` dank at kegel dot com
` (28 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hidden_peak at mail dot ru @ 2005-10-25 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #21 from hidden_peak at mail dot ru 2005-10-25 11:46 -------
May be is not gcc bug, but ld: the sample work with GNU ld version 2.12.90.0.1
20020307 Debian/GNU Linux, work with warnings with GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2.2
20041220 (SuSE Linux) and don't work with ld 2.16.x (all with gcc 3.4.4).
--
hidden_peak at mail dot ru changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hidden_peak at mail dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-25 11:46 ` hidden_peak at mail dot ru
@ 2005-11-18 18:19 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-12-30 10:24 ` pluto at agmk dot net
` (27 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2005-11-18 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #22 from dank at kegel dot com 2005-11-18 18:19 -------
We just ran into this trying to link a .a compiled with gcc-3.4.x
against an app using gcc-4.0.1. Unfortunately, the .a is from a third
party, so we can't share it or even look at the source ourselves.
Here are a couple other posts which mention a similar bug.
One of them almost has a simple test case.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/10/msg00316.html
http://groups.google.com/group/de.comp.lang.iso-c++/msg/88f4ecd82239131c
--
dank at kegel dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dank at kegel dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-25 11:46 ` hidden_peak at mail dot ru
2005-11-18 18:19 ` dank at kegel dot com
@ 2005-12-30 10:24 ` pluto at agmk dot net
2005-12-30 13:08 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
` (26 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: pluto at agmk dot net @ 2005-12-30 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #23 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-12-30 10:24 -------
testcase works for me with gcc-4.1.0-20051227 + binutils-2.16.91.0.5.
--
pluto at agmk dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-30 10:24 ` pluto at agmk dot net
@ 2005-12-30 13:08 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
2005-12-30 13:30 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
` (25 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: karol at mikronika dot com dot pl @ 2005-12-30 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #24 from karol at mikronika dot com dot pl 2005-12-30 13:07 -------
Test case doesn't work with gcc 3.3.6 and the latest cvs binutils
(2.16.91.20051230)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-30 13:08 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
@ 2005-12-30 13:30 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
2006-04-04 9:01 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
` (24 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: karol at mikronika dot com dot pl @ 2005-12-30 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #25 from karol at mikronika dot com dot pl 2005-12-30 13:30 -------
(In reply to comment #24)
> Test case doesn't work with gcc 3.3.6 and the latest cvs binutils
> (2.16.91.20051230)
>
Testcase work when I used binutils 2.12.1.
My OS box: Slackware 10.2 (i686)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-30 13:30 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
@ 2006-04-04 9:01 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
2006-05-02 21:02 ` simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com
` (23 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: karol at mikronika dot com dot pl @ 2006-04-04 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #26 from karol at mikronika dot com dot pl 2006-04-04 09:00 -------
Does anybody from gcc developers resolve this old bug issue at any finished
time?!
This is nearly 2 years old bug!!!
Greets,
Karol
(In reply to comment #25)
> (In reply to comment #24)
> > Test case doesn't work with gcc 3.3.6 and the latest cvs binutils
> > (2.16.91.20051230)
> >
>
> Testcase work when I used binutils 2.12.1.
>
> My OS box: Slackware 10.2 (i686)
>
--
karol at mikronika dot com dot pl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |karol at mikronika dot com
| |dot pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-04 9:01 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
@ 2006-05-02 21:02 ` simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com
2006-05-11 16:12 ` perry at kundert dot ca
` (22 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com @ 2006-05-02 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #27 from simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com 2006-05-02 21:01 -------
Here's a relatively simple test case, in case anyone wants one, that reproduces
either this problem, or a very similar one. It requires a mix of compilers,
and of optimization selections, to reproduce, though. One gcc 3 compiler and
one gcc 4 one should do it.
$ cat foo.h
class Foo {
public:
virtual ~Foo() {}
virtual inline int f(int x) {
switch (x) {
case 0: return 0; break;
case 1: return 1; break;
case 2: return 2; break; // cases 0 to 2 bulk out the switch statement
case 3: return 999; break; // cases 3 and 4 can be coalesced
case 4: return 999; break;
}
return -1;
}
};
extern int g(int);
extern int h();
$ cat lib1.cc
#include "foo.h"
int g(int i) {
Foo f;
return f.f(i);
}
$ cat lib2.cc
#include "foo.h"
int h() {
Foo f;
return f.f(0) + g(0);
}
$ cat main.cc
#include "foo.h"
int main() {
return g(0) + h();
}
$ ./g++-3.4.5 -Wall -W -pedantic -O2 -c lib1.cc
$ ./g++-3.4.5 -Wall -W -pedantic -O0 -c lib2.cc
$ ./g++-4.1.0 -Wall -W -pedantic -o main lib1.o lib2.o main.cc
/path/to/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld: `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN3Foo1fEi'
referenced in section `.rodata' of lib2.o: defined in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN3Foo1fEi' of lib2.o
... and so on
In this case, the ld in gcc 4.1 is version 2.16.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-02 21:02 ` simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com
@ 2006-05-11 16:12 ` perry at kundert dot ca
2006-05-11 16:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: perry at kundert dot ca @ 2006-05-11 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #28 from perry at kundert dot ca 2006-05-11 16:12 -------
This test case *still* exhibits the failure using only g++ 3.3.6, and binutils
2.16.1:
perry@honey:binutils-bug$ apt-show-versions g++-3.3
g++-3.3/testing uptodate 1:3.3.6-13
perry@honey:binutils-bug$ apt-show-versions binutils
binutils/testing uptodate 2.16.1cvs20060413-1
perry@honey:binutils-bug$ cat GNUmakefile
all: main
clean:
rm *.o
lib1.o: lib1.C
lib2.o: lib2.C
main: main.C lib1.o lib2.o
perry@honey:binutils-bug$ make clean all
rm *.o
g++ -c -o lib1.o lib1.C
g++ -c -o lib2.o lib2.C
g++ main.C lib1.o lib2.o -o main
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN3Foo1fEi' referenced in section `.rodata' of lib2.o:
defined in discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN3Foo1fEi' of lib2.o
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [main] Error 1
perry@honey:binutils-bug$
(In reply to comment #27)
> Here's a relatively simple test case, in case anyone wants one, that reproduces
> either this problem, or a very similar one. It requires a mix of compilers,
> and of optimization selections, to reproduce, though. One gcc 3 compiler and
> one gcc 4 one should do it.
>
>
> $ cat foo.h
> class Foo {
> public:
> virtual ~Foo() {}
> virtual inline int f(int x) {
> switch (x) {
> case 0: return 0; break;
> case 1: return 1; break;
> case 2: return 2; break; // cases 0 to 2 bulk out the switch statement
>
> case 3: return 999; break; // cases 3 and 4 can be coalesced
> case 4: return 999; break;
> }
> return -1;
> }
> };
>
> extern int g(int);
> extern int h();
>
> $ cat lib1.cc
> #include "foo.h"
>
> int g(int i) {
> Foo f;
> return f.f(i);
> }
>
> $ cat lib2.cc
> #include "foo.h"
>
> int h() {
> Foo f;
> return f.f(0) + g(0);
> }
>
> $ cat main.cc
> #include "foo.h"
>
> int main() {
> return g(0) + h();
> }
>
> $ ./g++-3.4.5 -Wall -W -pedantic -O2 -c lib1.cc
> $ ./g++-3.4.5 -Wall -W -pedantic -O0 -c lib2.cc
> $ ./g++-4.1.0 -Wall -W -pedantic -o main lib1.o lib2.o main.cc
> /path/to/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld: `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN3Foo1fEi'
> referenced in section `.rodata' of lib2.o: defined in discarded section
> `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN3Foo1fEi' of lib2.o
> ... and so on
>
> In this case, the ld in gcc 4.1 is version 2.16.1.
>
--
perry at kundert dot ca changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |perry at kundert dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-11 16:12 ` perry at kundert dot ca
@ 2006-05-11 16:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-12 13:41 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
` (20 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-11 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #29 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 16:16 -------
(In reply to comment #28)
> This test case *still* exhibits the failure using only g++ 3.3.6, and binutils
> 2.16.1:
Well 3.3.x is no longer being updated (likewise for 3.4.x).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-11 16:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-12 13:41 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
2006-09-22 16:57 ` kai dot engert at gmx dot de
` (19 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: karol at mikronika dot com dot pl @ 2006-05-12 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #30 from karol at mikronika dot com dot pl 2006-05-12 13:40 -------
Strange... I don't know why 3.3.x will not be updated. Currently line 3.3.x is
used in many stable/production environments like stable: Debian (sarge),
Slackware 10, Suse 10.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-12 13:41 ` karol at mikronika dot com dot pl
@ 2006-09-22 16:57 ` kai dot engert at gmx dot de
2006-10-02 20:16 ` hacksaw at hacksaw dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: kai dot engert at gmx dot de @ 2006-09-22 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #31 from kai dot engert at gmx dot de 2006-09-22 16:57 -------
Just FYI, I attempted to compile Mozilla 1.8 using gcc 3.3.6 on a Fedora Core 5
system. I ran into this bug. The only patch in this bug that applies to 3.3.6
is the patch found in comment 0. With that patch applied to gcc the Mozilla
build completed ok. I'm posting this comment using a Mozilla compiled that way.
--
kai dot engert at gmx dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kai dot engert at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-22 16:57 ` kai dot engert at gmx dot de
@ 2006-10-02 20:16 ` hacksaw at hacksaw dot org
2006-12-29 17:40 ` pfaff at mcmaster dot ca
` (17 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hacksaw at hacksaw dot org @ 2006-10-02 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #32 from hacksaw at hacksaw dot org 2006-10-02 20:15 -------
Is the 3.3.x tree closed? If that is the case, should someone mark this bug
WONTFIX, and those who care can move on patching their gcc or moving to a
higher one?
Has anyone reproduced this bug with a higher compiler version?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-02 20:16 ` hacksaw at hacksaw dot org
@ 2006-12-29 17:40 ` pfaff at mcmaster dot ca
2007-03-02 16:25 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
` (16 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: pfaff at mcmaster dot ca @ 2006-12-29 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #33 from pfaff at mcmaster dot ca 2006-12-29 17:40 -------
While trying to build some C++ code with g++-3.3.6 we encountered error
messages similar to those mentioned in earlier comments in this discussion:
`xxx' referenced in section `.rodata' of somefile.o: defined
in discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.t._zzz' of something.o
Searching for solutions to this error message led us to this gcc-bugzilla bug
#16625 discussion.
We were able to eliminate these error messages and successfuly compile our code
with g++-3.3.6 by using the '-frepo' option in our g++ compiles.
I understand that this may not be the ultimate solution to the bug(s) being
discussed here, but since we ended up here when searching for this particular
error message, I'm adding this comment in case it helps other people.
--
pfaff at mcmaster dot ca changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pfaff at mcmaster dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2006-12-29 17:40 ` pfaff at mcmaster dot ca
@ 2007-03-02 16:25 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
2007-03-02 19:43 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: michael dot klein at fazi dot de @ 2007-03-02 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #34 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-02 16:25 -------
Could the be related to
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-08/msg00187.html?
I'm getting those linker errors with both gcc 4.1.1 and gcc 4.1.2 on
x86-Solaris with GNU ld from binutils-070227, but only when compiling with -O2
or -O3, but not with -O0.
The referenced symbols shows up (gnm -a *.o) in several objects like this:
0000000000000000 t .gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10otl_streamlsEj
0000000000000000 W _ZN10otl_streamlsEj
But in the object mentioned in the error messages like this:
0000000000000000 r .gnu.linkonce.r._ZN10otl_streamlsEj
0000000000000000 t .gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10otl_streamlsEj
0000000000000000 W _ZN10otl_streamlsEj
One possible workaround is to reorder the objects during link, so that those
with .gnu.linkonce.r.* come first.
If this a compiler or a linker bug? (I'd blame the linker ;))
--
michael dot klein at fazi dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |michael dot klein at fazi
| |dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-02 16:25 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
@ 2007-03-02 19:43 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-03-05 8:43 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
` (14 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-03-02 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #35 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-03-02 19:43 -------
(In reply to comment #34)
> Could the be related to
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-08/msg00187.html?
>
> I'm getting those linker errors with both gcc 4.1.1 and gcc 4.1.2 on
> x86-Solaris with GNU ld from binutils-070227, but only when compiling with -O2
> or -O3, but not with -O0.
>
> The referenced symbols shows up (gnm -a *.o) in several objects like this:
>
> 0000000000000000 t .gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10otl_streamlsEj
> 0000000000000000 W _ZN10otl_streamlsEj
>
> But in the object mentioned in the error messages like this:
>
> 0000000000000000 r .gnu.linkonce.r._ZN10otl_streamlsEj
> 0000000000000000 t .gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10otl_streamlsEj
> 0000000000000000 W _ZN10otl_streamlsEj
>
> One possible workaround is to reorder the objects during link, so that those
> with .gnu.linkonce.r.* come first.
>
> If this a compiler or a linker bug? (I'd blame the linker ;))
>
It is most likely a Solaris specific compiler bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-02 19:43 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-03-05 8:43 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
2007-03-05 14:20 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: michael dot klein at fazi dot de @ 2007-03-05 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #36 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-05 08:43 -------
Subject: Re: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
>> One possible workaround is to reorder the objects during link, so that those
>> with .gnu.linkonce.r.* come first.
>>
>> If this a compiler or a linker bug? (I'd blame the linker ;))
>
> It is most likely a Solaris specific compiler bug.
Erm, this bug was originally reported for i686-pc-linux-gnu, and none of
the 33 previous comments refers to Solaris.
Forgot to mention that the bug exhibits only with GNU ld,
Solaris ld links fine without object reordering or other tricks.
/Michael
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-05 8:43 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
@ 2007-03-05 14:20 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-03-05 14:53 ` hidden_peak at mail dot ru
` (12 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-03-05 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #37 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-03-05 14:19 -------
(In reply to comment #36)
> Subject: Re: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
>
> >> One possible workaround is to reorder the objects during link, so that those
> >> with .gnu.linkonce.r.* come first.
> >>
> >> If this a compiler or a linker bug? (I'd blame the linker ;))
> >
> > It is most likely a Solaris specific compiler bug.
>
> Erm, this bug was originally reported for i686-pc-linux-gnu, and none of
> the 33 previous comments refers to Solaris.
>
> Forgot to mention that the bug exhibits only with GNU ld,
> Solaris ld links fine without object reordering or other tricks.
>
> /Michael
>
Can I reproduce it on Linux?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-05 14:20 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-03-05 14:53 ` hidden_peak at mail dot ru
2007-03-05 15:26 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hidden_peak at mail dot ru @ 2007-03-05 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #38 from hidden_peak at mail dot ru 2007-03-05 14:53 -------
(In reply to comment #37)
>
> Can I reproduce it on Linux?
>
May be comment #21 help you?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-05 14:53 ` hidden_peak at mail dot ru
@ 2007-03-05 15:26 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-03-05 16:21 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
` (10 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-03-05 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #39 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-03-05 15:25 -------
(In reply to comment #38)
> (In reply to comment #37)
> >
> > Can I reproduce it on Linux?
> >
>
> May be comment #21 help you?
>
That is an old compiler bug which has been fixed since then.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-05 15:26 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-03-05 16:21 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
2007-03-05 16:38 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: michael dot klein at fazi dot de @ 2007-03-05 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #40 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-05 16:20 -------
Subject: Re: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> Can I reproduce it on Linux?
Using gcc 4.1.1 with binutils-070227 I can also reproduce it on Linux,
binutils 2.15 from Debian Sarge do not exhibit this problem.
As this is a closes source application I can't upload the source code.
Would the generated asm code be of any help?
The smallest testcase I have is currently ~500k lines asm, split accross
two files.
/Michael
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-05 16:21 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
@ 2007-03-05 16:38 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-03-06 12:08 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
` (8 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-03-05 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #41 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-03-05 16:38 -------
(In reply to comment #40)
> Subject: Re: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
>
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
>
> > Can I reproduce it on Linux?
>
> Using gcc 4.1.1 with binutils-070227 I can also reproduce it on Linux,
> binutils 2.15 from Debian Sarge do not exhibit this problem.
>
> As this is a closes source application I can't upload the source code.
> Would the generated asm code be of any help?
>
> The smallest testcase I have is currently ~500k lines asm, split accross
> two files.
>
> /Michael
>
Assembly files will help. Please make them available.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-05 16:38 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-03-06 12:08 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
2007-03-06 15:27 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: michael dot klein at fazi dot de @ 2007-03-06 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #42 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-06 12:07 -------
Created an attachment (id=13152)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13152&action=view)
Testcase (generated assembly files from gcc 4.1.1)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-06 12:08 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
@ 2007-03-06 15:27 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-03-06 16:33 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-03-06 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #43 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-03-06 15:27 -------
(In reply to comment #42)
> Created an attachment (id=13152)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13152&action=view) [edit]
> Testcase (generated assembly files from gcc 4.1.1)
>
I got
bash-3.1$ readelf -S -N fzotl.o | grep ZN10otl_streamlsEPKc
[257] .gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10otl_streamlsEPKc
[258] .rel.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10otl_streamlsEPKc
bash-3.1$ readelf -S -N fzconfig.o | grep ZN10otl_streamlsEPKc
[338] .gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10otl_streamlsEPKc
[339] .rel.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN10otl_streamlsEPKc
[340] .gnu.linkonce.r._ZN10otl_streamlsEPKc
[341] .rel.gnu.linkonce.r._ZN10otl_streamlsEPKc
bash-3.1$ readelf -g fzotl.o fzconfig.o
File: fzotl.o
There are no section groups in this file.
File: fzconfig.o
There are no section groups in this file.
bash-3.1$
It means your gcc 4.1.1 was built with a very old binutils and it doesn't
support COMDAT group, which is needed to fix this bug. You have 2
choices:
1. Rebuild gcc 4.1.1 with the current Linux binutils.
2. Use a different Linux distribution with a proper gcc 4.1. FC6 is
OK.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-06 15:27 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-03-06 16:33 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
2007-03-07 10:14 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: michael dot klein at fazi dot de @ 2007-03-06 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #44 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-06 16:33 -------
(In reply to comment #43)
> It means your gcc 4.1.1 was built with a very old binutils and it doesn't
> support COMDAT group
Yes, this gcc was build with binutils 2.15 from Debian Sarge.
Thanks
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-06 16:33 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
@ 2007-03-07 10:14 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
2007-03-07 10:20 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: michael dot klein at fazi dot de @ 2007-03-07 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #45 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-07 10:13 -------
Created an attachment (id=13157)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13157&action=view)
Patch to configure test for comdat support work with binutils snapshots
gcc's configure test for COMDAT support seems to work only with regular
releases but not with snapshots, where gld doesn't print a version number:
$ gld -v
GNU ld version 070227 20070227
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-07 10:14 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
@ 2007-03-07 10:20 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
2007-03-07 14:33 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: michael dot klein at fazi dot de @ 2007-03-07 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #46 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-07 10:20 -------
Created an attachment (id=13158)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13158&action=view)
Non-reversed patch to make configure test for comdat support work with binutils
snapshots
--
michael dot klein at fazi dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #13157|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-07 10:20 ` michael dot klein at fazi dot de
@ 2007-03-07 14:33 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-04-25 17:16 ` zhong dot xie at yahoo dot ca
` (2 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-03-07 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #47 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-03-07 14:33 -------
(In reply to comment #45)
> Created an attachment (id=13157)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13157&action=view) [edit]
> Patch to configure test for comdat support work with binutils snapshots
>
> gcc's configure test for COMDAT support seems to work only with regular
> releases but not with snapshots, where gld doesn't print a version number:
>
> $ gld -v
> GNU ld version 070227 20070227
>
It has been fixed in CVS:
bash-3.1$ ./ld/ld-new -V
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.17.50.20070307
Supported emulations:
elf_x86_64
elf_i386
i386linux
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2007-03-07 14:33 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-04-25 17:16 ` zhong dot xie at yahoo dot ca
2007-09-07 7:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-03 18:18 ` tg at mirbsd dot org
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: zhong dot xie at yahoo dot ca @ 2007-04-25 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #48 from zhong dot xie at yahoo dot ca 2007-04-25 18:16 -------
Solaris 10 x86 i386
gcc 3.3.6,
binutils 2.17.50.20070307
has the same issue.
binutils 2.17.50.20070307 not even compile under this platform. We have to
modify some scripts to make it work.
--
zhong dot xie at yahoo dot ca changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |zhong dot xie at yahoo dot
| |ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-25 17:16 ` zhong dot xie at yahoo dot ca
@ 2007-09-07 7:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-03 18:18 ` tg at mirbsd dot org
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-07 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #49 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-07 07:08 -------
The bug has been fixed by
2005-05-08 Julian Brown <julian@codesourcery.com>
H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
* configure.ac: Set ld_vers_major, ld_vers_minor and ld_vers_patch for
GNU linker. Support linker version x.x.x.x.x. Require GNU linker
20050308/2.16.0 or newer for comdat group.
* configure: Regenerated.
* config.in: Regenerated.
* varasm.c (default_function_rodata_section): Put .rodata section in
COMDAT group when necessary.
(default_elf_asm_named_section): Rename HAVE_GAS_COMDAT_GROUP to
HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP.
(default_unique_section_1): Don't use .gnu.linkonce when COMDAT is
available.
in GCC 4.1 or later.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16625] Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
[not found] <bug-16625-8878@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-07 7:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-03 18:18 ` tg at mirbsd dot org
29 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: tg at mirbsd dot org @ 2010-04-03 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #50 from tg at mirbsd dot org 2010-04-03 18:18 -------
For the archives: I have a backport of this for gcc 3.4.6 (actually, two
commits 100490D02CD2CE90D8F and 10049E3533B275F48CB in MirBSD) because it
affects being unable to build LLVM, too. Mail me if interested.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread