public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 00:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040720005006.5600.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030817022106.11953.carlo@alinoe.com>
------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-20 00:50 -------
Sorry guys, I'm just getting back to this.
Ranier, I think you are right: we should make an osf directory, dupe the files,
and remove the gthr-posix.h unconditional defines.
Do you want to do this? Let's try to fix this for 3.4.2. I think this is a high
priority bug BTW.
I have to say that John Maddock really does have a huge point with the
consistency issue. It's incredibly annoying that -pthreads/-pthread/-mthread
even exist, when -pthread across all would have been much, much better. Why does
gcc do this crazy stuff? Ugh. I guess we cannot fix this particular bit for
3.4.2, although, quite frankly, we should.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11953
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-20 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-17 2:21 [Bug c++/11953] New: " carlo at alinoe dot com
2003-08-17 2:28 ` [Bug c++/11953] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-17 2:37 ` [Bug other/11953] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-17 2:56 ` carlo at alinoe dot com
2003-09-10 12:55 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-15 14:17 ` carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-13 15:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-13 15:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-14 16:26 ` [Bug libstdc++/11953] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-05-14 17:08 ` ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-14 17:40 ` john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk
2004-05-15 20:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-19 10:33 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-05-19 13:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-20 0:10 ` john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk
2004-06-09 19:18 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-09 19:25 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-06-09 19:30 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-06-09 19:30 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2004-06-09 19:37 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-06-18 23:41 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-20 0:50 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2004-07-22 13:19 ` redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-22 13:40 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-19 20:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-10 15:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-08 13:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-08 13:53 ` carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-11 11:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-11 12:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-30 19:37 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-19 17:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-13 3:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-14 13:19 ` cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2005-07-15 22:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-29 11:26 ` david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk
2005-07-29 12:20 ` david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk
2005-07-29 13:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-11953-794@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-07 3:12 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-28 13:37 ` marc dot waeckerlin at siemens dot com
2005-11-29 9:14 ` marc dot waeckerlin at siemens dot com
2005-11-29 9:27 ` marc dot waeckerlin at siemens dot com
2005-11-29 9:34 ` marc dot waeckerlin at siemens dot com
2005-11-29 16:06 ` carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-17 21:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28 8:47 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-05 16:06 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-12-11 18:13 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-12 15:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-12 15:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-12 15:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-13 9:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-17 13:47 ` doko at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-17 13:53 ` doko at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-17 13:57 ` doko at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040720005006.5600.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).