From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5418 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2004 04:35:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5408 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jul 2004 04:35:42 -0000 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 04:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040722043542.5407.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040718033747.16612.steve.horn@gs.com> References: <20040718033747.16612.steve.horn@gs.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg02625.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-22 04:35 ------- I can reproduce this on x86/linux (FC2) with both gcc-3.3.3 and gcc-3.4.2. I wonder how to fix this gracefully. A shared memory allocator of some kind should probably be added as an extension, regardless. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612