public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/16656] New: [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate
@ 2004-07-21 11:39 falk at debian dot org
2004-07-21 11:39 ` [Bug tree-optimization/16656] " falk at debian dot org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: falk at debian dot org @ 2004-07-21 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
3.5-tree-ssa-lno 20040719 (merged 20040718)
The attached 297k c++ source takes at least 90 minutes to compile on my system
at -O, apparently it triggers an infinite loop or at least really bad worst case
time complexity. g++ 3.5.0 20040627 takes "only" about two minutes at -O.
According to oprofile, 99.9403% of the time is spent in find_best_candidate.
--
Summary: [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate
Product: gcc
Version: lno
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: falk at debian dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/16656] [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate
2004-07-21 11:39 [Bug tree-optimization/16656] New: [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate falk at debian dot org
@ 2004-07-21 11:39 ` falk at debian dot org
2004-07-21 17:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: falk at debian dot org @ 2004-07-21 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2004-07-21 11:39 -------
Created an attachment (id=6792)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6792&action=view)
Test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/16656] [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate
2004-07-21 11:39 [Bug tree-optimization/16656] New: [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate falk at debian dot org
2004-07-21 11:39 ` [Bug tree-optimization/16656] " falk at debian dot org
@ 2004-07-21 17:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-22 3:30 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-21 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Target Milestone|--- |lno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/16656] [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate
2004-07-21 11:39 [Bug tree-optimization/16656] New: [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate falk at debian dot org
2004-07-21 11:39 ` [Bug tree-optimization/16656] " falk at debian dot org
2004-07-21 17:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-22 3:30 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-22 13:43 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-22 3:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-22 03:30 -------
The function apparently contains a loop with some 1500 memory references whose
addresses are givs... ooops...
Just giving up on such a beast seems a sane choice to me. I will send patch
soon.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-07-22 03:30:01
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/16656] [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate
2004-07-21 11:39 [Bug tree-optimization/16656] New: [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate falk at debian dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-22 3:30 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-22 13:43 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-07-23 14:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-23 14:11 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-07-22 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-07-22 13:42 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Just giving up on such a beast seems a sane choice to me. I will send patch
> soon.
Mention the PR number in a comment. Maybe, if one day the algorithm is
improved, we can test it again with this degenerated case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/16656] [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate
2004-07-21 11:39 [Bug tree-optimization/16656] New: [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate falk at debian dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-22 13:43 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-07-23 14:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-23 14:11 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-23 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-23 14:03 -------
Subject: Bug 16656
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: lno-branch
Changes by: rakdver@gcc.gnu.org 2004-07-23 14:03:25
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog.lno tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
Log message:
PR tree-optimization/16656
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (CONSIDER_ALL_CANDIDATES_BOUND): Increase
to 30.
(MAX_CONSIDERED_USES): New.
(set_cost_up_to, try_add_cand_for): New functions.
(set_cost): Use set_cost_up_to.
(find_best_candidate, get_initial_solution): Improve efficiency.
(tree_ssa_iv_optimize_loop): Fail if there are more than
MAX_CONSIDERED_USES iv uses in the loop.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.lno.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=lno-branch&r1=1.1.2.232&r2=1.1.2.233
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=lno-branch&r1=1.1.2.47&r2=1.1.2.48
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/16656] [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate
2004-07-21 11:39 [Bug tree-optimization/16656] New: [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate falk at debian dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-23 14:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-23 14:11 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-23 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-23 14:11 -------
Fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-23 14:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-21 11:39 [Bug tree-optimization/16656] New: [lno] huge amounts of time spent in find_best_candidate falk at debian dot org
2004-07-21 11:39 ` [Bug tree-optimization/16656] " falk at debian dot org
2004-07-21 17:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-22 3:30 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-22 13:43 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-07-23 14:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-23 14:11 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).