public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/15000] Support setting the default symbol visibility for ELF
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 01:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040726013134.17441.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040418032536.15000.bryner@brianryner.com>
------- Additional Comments From s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-07-26 01:31 -------
(In reply to comment #38)
> (In reply to comment #32)
>
> > The new -fvisibility-inlines-hidden isn't being aggressive enough in hiding
> > inlines members and I don't know why. I'm using DECL_INLINE() which I
> > think is correct? Any help here would be appreciated.
>
> You can try with DECL_DECLARED_INLINE.
Is this true when a member function has been defined in the class declaration?
Is DECL_INLINE only true when the optimiser decides it, or is it true more or
less often than DECL_DECLARED_INLINE?
Cheers,
Niall
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15000
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-26 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-18 4:27 [Bug other/15000] New: " bryner at brianryner dot com
2004-04-18 8:16 ` [Bug other/15000] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-18 13:37 ` bryner at brianryner dot com
2004-04-19 2:59 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-04-19 3:16 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-04-19 3:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-19 15:21 ` bryner at brianryner dot com
2004-04-19 21:29 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-04-19 23:52 ` bryner at brianryner dot com
2004-04-20 1:05 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-04-20 9:05 ` bryner at brianryner dot com
2004-04-22 2:42 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-04-22 2:51 ` bryner at brianryner dot com
2004-04-22 18:40 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-04-22 18:48 ` bryner at brianryner dot com
2004-04-22 20:37 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-04-22 21:21 ` zack at codesourcery dot com
2004-04-23 5:31 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-04-28 19:43 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-05-03 2:36 ` bryner at brianryner dot com
2004-05-03 4:18 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-05-05 6:52 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-05-05 8:26 ` bryner at brianryner dot com
2004-05-05 20:38 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-05-06 3:21 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-05-11 17:08 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-05-13 11:42 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-05-30 1:43 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-07-25 22:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-25 23:34 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
2004-07-25 23:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-25 23:57 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-07-26 1:31 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com [this message]
2004-08-17 3:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-18 22:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-01 16:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040726013134.17441.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).