From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-104611-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5695 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2004 11:26:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5685 invoked by uid 48); 26 Jul 2004 11:26:53 -0000
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040726112653.5684.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "marco at technoboredom dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040726105424.16713.marco@technoboredom.net>
References: <20040726105424.16713.marco@technoboredom.net>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/16713] call of template member function rejected
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg02905.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From marco at technoboredom dot net  2004-07-26 11:26 -------
After getting suspicious on the validity of the code (though accepted by other
compilers), I found that the correct, insane syntax is: 

template<class T>
void fail() 
{
  T::template fail<T>(); 
}

My regrets. 


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16713