From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20872 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2004 06:03:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20855 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jul 2004 06:03:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040728060332.20854.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> References: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/14563] new/delete much slower than malloc/free X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg03337.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-28 06:03 ------- I think basically you are messed up untill Cygwin switches to dwarf2 exceptions. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|libstdc++ |target Ever Confirmed| |1 Keywords| |EH, missed-optimization, | |sjlj-eh Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-07-28 06:03:30 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563