From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4064 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2004 21:09:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4050 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jul 2004 21:09:25 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040728210925.4048.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040728205314.16808.falk@debian.org> References: <20040728205314.16808.falk@debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/16808] [3.5 Regression] verify_ssa failed: Missing definition for SSA_NAME X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg03401.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-28 21:09 ------- The problem comes from folding exp(0.0) to 1.0 in fab. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org Severity|normal |critical GCC build triplet|alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu | GCC host triplet|alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu | GCC target triplet|alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu | Last reconfirmed|2004-07-28 21:02:52 |2004-07-28 21:09:24 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16808