From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29267 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2004 02:33:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29252 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jul 2004 02:33:32 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 02:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040730023332.29251.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040729195117.16820.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040729195117.16820.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/16820] Failure of all gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 tests X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg03529.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-30 02:33 ------- I agree that the issue is minor but I think we need a policy here, or else we will soon have thousands of testsuite failures on non C99 targets. The onus should not be on the backend maintainers to work out xfail code for testsuite additions that require C99 library and header support on a case-by-case basis. There needs to be something like a "c99_available" proc in target-supports.exp. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mark at codesourcery dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16820