From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8944 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2004 17:33:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8910 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2004 17:33:27 -0000 Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040731173327.8909.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030603112812.11078.jtotland1@chello.no> References: <20030603112812.11078.jtotland1@chello.no> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11078] [ABI] ICE in write_type with typeof and templates X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg03703.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-07-31 17:33 ------- Subject: Re: [ABI] ICE in write_type with typeof and templates "giovannibajo at libero dot it" writes: | Ian, what do you suggest here? It might make sense to mangle it as "v17typeofe" | and "v17typeoft" (we need different mangling for the expression vs type case of | course). I'm sure there won't be an official ABI mangling of "typeof", | especially if the C++ committee is going to use "auto" and "decltype", so we | could probably go ahead and use the vendor extension. Even if/when the C++ standards committee decides on decltype, we still need something for typeof or similar operator. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11078