From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19582 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2004 23:36:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19573 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2004 23:36:12 -0000 Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 23:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040801233612.19570.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040709031204.16446.billingd@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040709031204.16446.billingd@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au 2004-08-01 23:36 ------- Subject: RE: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers I have logged a support call with SGI over the complex float vararg issue exposed by Richard's test case foo.c. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446