From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12303 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2004 07:48:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12295 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2004 07:48:49 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 07:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040803074849.12294.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040730143031.16834.jozef.kruger@philips.com> References: <20040730143031.16834.jozef.kruger@philips.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/16834] [3.3 Regression] huge compilation time increase from 3.2.3 to 3.3.2 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-08-03 07:48 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] huge compilation time increase from 3.2.3 to 3.3.2 "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" writes: | -- | What |Removed |Added | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Keywords| |compile-time-hog | Summary|huge compilation time |[3.3 Regression] huge | |increase from 3.2.3 to 3.3.2|compilation time increase | | |from 3.2.3 to 3.3.2 | Target Milestone|--- |3.3.5 I don't think anyone wants to touch the C front-end on gcc-3_3-branch at this point. So, let's just recognize we're faulty and say we won't fix it for 3.3.x. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16834