From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31324 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2004 22:00:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31315 invoked by uid 48); 3 Aug 2004 22:00:15 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 22:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040803220015.31314.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040803203120.16865.v.haisman@sh.cvut.cz> References: <20040803203120.16865.v.haisman@sh.cvut.cz> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/16865] False alarm about use of uninitialized variable breaks bootstrap at -O3 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-03 22:00 ------- The var-tracking ones look like a real bug in the compiler code (not in this var-tracking one though): if (!vt_get_decl_and_offset (incoming, &decl, &offset)) if (!vt_get_decl_and_offset (decl_rtl, &decl, &offset)) continue; Now the cp/parser one is really a true posiable use of the uninitialized variable. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu |org |dot org Status|REOPENED |NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16865