* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-09 3:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-15 2:05 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (20 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-09 3:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c |target
Keywords| |ABI, wrong-code
Summary|Irix calling conventions for|Irix calling conventions for
|complex numbers |complex numbers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-09 3:43 ` [Bug target/16446] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-15 2:05 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-18 12:32 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-15 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-15 02:05 -------
Here is some data. I have generated assembler for the following
two subroutines.
For mipspro 7.4.1m c99
% cat my_creal.c
#include <complex.h>
double my_creal(complex double x)
{
return creal (x);
}
and for gcc-3.5
%cat my_creal_gcc.c
extern double creal (double _Complex);
double my_creal(_Complex double x)
{
return creal (x);
}
Here is the assembler generated at -O3
cat my_creal.s
.file 1 "/usr/people/billingd/dev/gfortran/my_creal.c"
.set noreorder
.set noat
# /usr/lib32/cmplrs/be::7.41
#-----------------------------------------------------------
# Compiling my_creal.c (/tmp/ctmB.BAAaBjkQ1)
#-----------------------------------------------------------
#-----------------------------------------------------------
# Options:
#-----------------------------------------------------------
# Target:R10000, ISA:mips4, Pointer Size:32
# -O3 (Optimization level)
# -g0 (Debug level)
# -m1 (Report warnings)
#-----------------------------------------------------------
.section .text, 1, 0x00000006, 4, 64
.text:
.section .text
# Program Unit: my_creal
.ent my_creal
.globl my_creal
my_creal: # 0x0
.dynsym my_creal sto_default
.frame $sp, 0, $31
.loc 1 4 1
# 1 #include <complex.h>
# 2
# 3 double my_creal(complex double x)
# 4 {
.BB1.my_creal: # 0x0
#<freq>
#<freq> BB:1 frequency = 1.00000 (heuristic)
#<freq>
.loc 1 5 3
# 5 return creal (x);
jr $31 # [0]
.loc 1 4 1
mov.d $f0,$f12 # [0]
.end my_creal
.section .text
.align 6
.gpvalue 30720
cat my_creal_gcc.s
#.file 1 "my_creal_gcc.c"
.option pic2
.section .text,0x1,0x6,4,8
.text
.align 2
.align 2
.align 3
.globl my_creal
.ent my_creal
my_creal:
.LFB2:
.frame $sp,0,$31 # vars= 0, regs= 0/0, args= 0, gp= 0
.mask 0x00000000,0
.fmask 0x00000000,0
.set noreorder
.set nomacro
dmtc1 $4,$f0
j $31
nop
.set macro
.set reorder
.LFE2:
.end my_creal
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rsandifo at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-09 3:43 ` [Bug target/16446] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-15 2:05 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-18 12:32 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-18 13:19 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-18 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-18 12:32 -------
Thanks for the information. Could you do a similar test for
_Complex float as well?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-18 12:32 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-18 13:19 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-18 21:53 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-18 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-18 13:19 -------
On second thoughts, could you send the MIPSpro output of:
#include <complex.h>
double d1 (double x, complex double y) { return creal (y); }
double d2 (int x, complex double y) { return creal (y); }
double d3 (complex double y) { return creal (y); }
float f1 (float x, complex float y) { return crealf (y); }
float f2 (int x, complex float y) { return crealf (y); }
float f3 (complex float y) { return crealf (y); }
for both -n32 and -64? If you have access to an o32
fortran compiler, the output of the equivalent fortran
program for -32 would be really helpful too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-18 13:19 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-18 21:53 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-18 21:54 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-18 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-18 21:53 -------
Created an attachment (id=6773)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6773&action=view)
irix c99 assembler output
Output from Richard Sandiford's test case
c99 -S -o test_complex-n32.s -O3 -n32 test_complex.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-18 21:53 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-18 21:54 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-18 22:07 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-18 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-18 21:54 -------
Created an attachment (id=6774)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6774&action=view)
Irix MipsPRO assembler
Output from Richard Sandiford's test case
c99 -S -o test_complex-n64.s -O3 -n64 test_complex.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-18 21:54 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-18 22:07 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-18 22:08 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-18 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-18 22:07 -------
Created an attachment (id=6775)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6775&action=view)
Fortran version of Richard's test program
Fortran version of Richard's test program
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-18 22:07 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-18 22:08 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-18 22:11 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-18 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-18 22:08 -------
Created an attachment (id=6776)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6776&action=view)
-32 assembler from fortran test program
Output from
f77 -S -32 -O3 test_complex.f
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-18 22:08 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-18 22:11 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-18 22:12 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-18 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-18 22:11 -------
Created an attachment (id=6777)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6777&action=view)
-n32 assembler fro fortran test program
For completeness
f77 -S -n32 -O3 -o test_complex-f-n32.s test_complex.f
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-18 22:11 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-18 22:12 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-19 17:13 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-18 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-18 22:12 -------
Created an attachment (id=6778)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6778&action=view)
-64 assembler from fortran test case
and for bonus points, output from
f77 -S -64 -O3 -o test_complex-f-64.s test_complex.f
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-18 22:12 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-19 17:13 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-19 17:16 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-19 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-19 17:13 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-19 17:16 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-20 1:50 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-19 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-19 17:16 -------
So that I don't get two copies ;)
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|rsandifo at redhat dot com |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-19 17:16 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-20 1:50 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-28 23:59 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-20 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-20 01:50 -------
For the record, a reference for this is:
IRIX 6.5 > Books > Developer > MIPSpro N32 ABI Handbook > Chapter 2
(document number: 007-2816-005)
http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?
coll=0650&db=bks&fname=/SGI_Developer/Mpro_n32_ABI/ch02.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-20 1:50 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-28 23:59 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-29 6:04 ` rsandifo at redhat dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-28 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-28 23:59 -------
Output from irix c99 foo.c test program
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 6
0 7
0 1.87053e-29
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 6
0 7
0 1.87053e-29
PS: Richard, if you keep apologising for delays I will want my money back.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-28 23:59 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-29 6:04 ` rsandifo at redhat dot com
2004-08-01 23:36 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
` (6 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at redhat dot com @ 2004-07-29 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at redhat dot com 2004-07-29 06:04 -------
Subject: Re: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
"billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> ------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-28 23:59 -------
> Output from irix c99 foo.c test program
>
> 0 1
> 0 2
> 0 3
> 0 4
> 0 5
> 0 6
> 0 7
> 0 1.87053e-29
> 0 1
> 0 2
> 0 3
> 0 4
> 0 5
> 0 6
> 0 7
> 0 1.87053e-29
A bug! I thought so! The problem is that the real and imaginary
parts of complex float varargs are being passed in two separate GPRs:
+------+------+
|......| real | GPR i
+------+------+
|......| imag | GPR i+1
+------+------+
but stack varargs are passed as follows:
+------+------+
| real | imag | Stack word i
+------+------+
|......|......| Stack word i+1
+------+------+
What's more, it looks like MIPSpro's va_arg() expects neither of these,
and instead wants:
+------+------+
| real | imag | Stack word i
+------+------+
(i.e. with no word of padding).
Are you in a position to send this to SGI? At the moment, it doesn't
look like we can hope for compatibility as far as complex floats go.
Complex doubles should be easy though.
> PS: Richard, if you keep apologising for delays I will want my money back.
;) Point taken.
Richard
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-29 6:04 ` rsandifo at redhat dot com
@ 2004-08-01 23:36 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
2004-08-02 9:40 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
` (5 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au @ 2004-08-01 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au 2004-08-01 23:36 -------
Subject: RE: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
I have logged a support call with SGI over the complex float vararg issue exposed by Richard's test case foo.c.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-01 23:36 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
@ 2004-08-02 9:40 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
2004-08-05 0:02 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au @ 2004-08-02 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au 2004-08-02 09:40 -------
Subject: RE: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
> From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
>
> David, could you give the attached patch a whirl?
Thanks. I have done a C/gfortran bootstrap (-n32 and -64 only),
and run a few of the C test programs that failed before.
OK so far. Obviously I need to do a lot more testing.
The <complex.h> header needs some work, so testsuite results
aren't useful yet.
David
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-02 9:40 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
@ 2004-08-05 0:02 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-14 7:37 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-05 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-05 00:02 -------
The SGI case number for the complex float vararg issue is 2550057. SGI agree
that it is possible that there is problem with their compiler, and are
investigating further.
I have done a little more testing of Richard's patch. All OK so far.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-05 0:02 ` billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-14 7:37 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-14 14:36 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
` (2 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-14 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-14 07:37 -------
Hi David,
Just wondering: where do we stand on this? Do you think the patch
is good to go, or is there some more testing you'd like to do?
If there is, that's fine, I can hold off until you've finished.
FWIW, I've been testing the patch locally with a minor correction:
replacing the "==" in "== MAX_ARGS_IN_REGISTERS - 1" with ">=".
The patch doesn't seem to introduce any new failures for me:
the one I mentioned earlier seems to have been a glitch.
Richard
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-14 7:37 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-14 14:36 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
2004-08-19 18:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-19 19:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au @ 2004-08-14 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au 2004-08-14 14:36 -------
Subject: RE: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
Richard,
I haven't had time to look at this recently, and am unlikely do anything
in the next couple of weeks.
I did do a little more testing and didn't find any problem. Lets go with
your patch.
David
__________________________________________________________________
NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are private and confidential and
may contain privileged information
If you are not an authorised recipient, the copying or distribution
of this e-mail and any attachments is prohibited and you must not
read, print or act in reliance on this e-mail or attachments
This notice should not be removed
__________________________________________________________________
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-14 14:36 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
@ 2004-08-19 18:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-19 19:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-19 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-19 18:44 -------
Subject: Bug 16446
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org 2004-08-19 18:44:33
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog
gcc/config/mips: mips.c
Log message:
PR target/16446
* config/mips/mips.c (struct mips_arg_info): Delete num_bytes.
(mips_arg_info): Update accordingly. Remove common treatment of fpr_p;
treat each ABI separately. Deal with n32/n64 complex float arguments.
(function_arg): Add associated complex handling here.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.4987&r2=2.4988
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/mips/mips.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.448&r2=1.449
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/16446] Irix calling conventions for complex numbers
2004-07-09 3:12 [Bug c/16446] New: Irix calling conventions for complex numbers billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-19 18:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-19 19:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-19 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-19 19:01 -------
Patch now applied. Thanks for all the help and testing.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16446
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread