From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22783 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2004 14:24:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22765 invoked by uid 48); 5 Aug 2004 14:24:37 -0000 Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040805142437.22764.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020510135600.6628.ge@cs.twsu.edu> References: <20020510135600.6628.ge@cs.twsu.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/6628] cannot typedef const functions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-08-05 14:24 ------- The exact place in the standard is 9.3/9, btw. It's not up to me, but I think this syntax is gross. The declaration of member functions this way looks exactly like the declaration of a member variable of type pointer-to-function :-( W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6628