From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21201 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2004 20:47:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21194 invoked by uid 48); 8 Aug 2004 20:47:18 -0000 Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 20:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040808204718.21193.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "eleven at ludojad dot itpp dot pl" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040808162037.16920.eleven@ludojad.itpp.pl> References: <20040808162037.16920.eleven@ludojad.itpp.pl> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/16920] possible generation of broken asm code? (C, C++, gcc 3.4.1) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00592.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From eleven at ludojad dot itpp dot pl 2004-08-08 20:47 ------- unfortunately - the "bug" is still there until I have setlocale(LC_TIME, "C") before calling sesstime(). in fact it generates wrong results whatever LC_TIME value I use (and 64 bit code is generated). setlocale() has no effect when compiled with -m32 (it works ok then). this makes me wonder if it may be rather some glibc issue rather than gcc problem. I'd appreciate any hints on that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16920