public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/16937] New: Compiler segmentation fault - compound derived types are not acceptable function arguments
@ 2004-08-09 14:22 paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-08-09 16:03 ` [Bug fortran/16937] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-09 17:45 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr @ 2004-08-09 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
! $ ../bin/gfortran bug4.f90 -o test
! bug4.f90: In function `MAIN__':
! bug4.f90:30: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
! Please submit a full bug report,
! with preprocessed source if appropriate.
! See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
!
!Apparently compound derived types are not acceptable function arguments
program Array_List
implicit none
character (len=5),dimension(3) :: carray = (/"one","two","three"/)
type :: Compound
integer :: Count
character (len = 4) :: Name
end type Compound
type :: Table
type (Compound) :: Data (2)
integer :: L_Size
end type Table
type (Compound) :: Element1 = Compound(1,"one")
type (Compound) :: Element2 = Compound(2,"two")
type (Table) :: ElementTable
ElementTable%Data(1) = Element1
ElementTable%Data(2) = Element2
ElementTable%L_size = 2
print *, test( ElementTable%Data(: ElementTable%L_size )%Name )
!! the following work correctly
!! print *, ElementTable%Data(: ElementTable%L_size )%Name
!! print *, test( carray )
stop
contains
function test ( list ) result ( num )
integer :: num
character (len=*) :: list(:)
num = Size( List )
return
end function test
end program Array_List
--
Summary: Compiler segmentation fault - compound derived types are
not acceptable function arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 3.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
CC: bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu
dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16937
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/16937] Compiler segmentation fault - compound derived types are not acceptable function arguments 2004-08-09 14:22 [Bug fortran/16937] New: Compiler segmentation fault - compound derived types are not acceptable function arguments paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr @ 2004-08-09 16:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-09 17:45 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-09 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-09 16:03 ------- Confirmed. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-08-09 16:03:09 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16937 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/16937] Compiler segmentation fault - compound derived types are not acceptable function arguments 2004-08-09 14:22 [Bug fortran/16937] New: Compiler segmentation fault - compound derived types are not acceptable function arguments paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-08-09 16:03 ` [Bug fortran/16937] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-09 17:45 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-09 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-09 17:45 ------- Here's a reduced version: ============================ program FOO type :: T character :: C(1) end type T type (T) :: X call BAR( X%C(:1) ) end program FOO ============================ If I replace call BAR( X%C(:1) ) by X%C(:1)='X' I get f951: ../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:1741: gfc_trans_scalar_assign: Assertion `lse->string_length != (tree) ((void *)0) && rse->string_length != (tree) ((void *)0)' failed. lall.f90: In function `MAIN__': lall.f90:8: internal compiler error: Aborted Please submit a full bug report, [etc.] If I replace the character variable by an integer variable, the code compiles fine. Therefore I think it's a problem with character arrays and thus a dupe of PR 15196. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15196 *** -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16937 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-09 17:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-08-09 14:22 [Bug fortran/16937] New: Compiler segmentation fault - compound derived types are not acceptable function arguments paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-08-09 16:03 ` [Bug fortran/16937] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-09 17:45 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).