public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/5675] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions
       [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm-gccbugs@polyomino.org.uk>
@ 2004-08-11 20:50 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-08-11 21:05 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-11 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-08-11 20:50 -------
Semi-formal model of constant expressions proposed for discussion:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-08/msg00377.html
(with informal documentation of the extensions in GNU C).

Note that some cases additional to those failing when this bug was reported
started failing around 24 March.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2004-03/msg00022.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5675


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/5675] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions
       [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm-gccbugs@polyomino.org.uk>
  2004-08-11 20:50 ` [Bug c/5675] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-11 21:05 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-25  2:21 ` [Bug c/5675] [4.0 regression] " geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-25  2:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-11 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |16989
              nThis|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5675


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/5675] [4.0 regression] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions
       [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm-gccbugs@polyomino.org.uk>
  2004-08-11 20:50 ` [Bug c/5675] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-08-11 21:05 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-25  2:21 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-25  2:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-25  2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-25 02:21 -------
GCC is now more consistent about when this bug triggers, so some cases which passed in 3.4 fail in 
4.0.

There are testcases for this bug, gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-3.c and gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-3.c.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2004-02-16 04:46:57         |2004-10-25 02:21:16
               date|                            |
            Summary|const variables wrongly     |[4.0 regression] const
                   |considered part of constant |variables wrongly considered
                   |expressions                 |part of constant expressions


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5675


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/5675] [4.0 regression] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions
       [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm-gccbugs@polyomino.org.uk>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-10-25  2:21 ` [Bug c/5675] [4.0 regression] " geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-25  2:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-25  2:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5675


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/5675] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions
       [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
  2005-01-17 18:57 ` [Bug c/5675] " ian at airs dot com
  2005-01-24  0:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-25  2:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-25  2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
   Last reconfirmed|2004-12-05 04:31:32         |2005-04-25 02:08:58
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5675


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/5675] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions
       [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
  2005-01-17 18:57 ` [Bug c/5675] " ian at airs dot com
@ 2005-01-24  0:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-25  2:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-24  0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.0.0                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5675


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/5675] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions
       [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
@ 2005-01-17 18:57 ` ian at airs dot com
  2005-01-24  0:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-25  2:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ian at airs dot com @ 2005-01-17 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com  2005-01-17 18:57 -------
This bug is not fixed, but the 4.0 regression has been fixed.  4.0 now fails in
the same way as earlier gcc versions.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[4.0 regression] const      |const variables wrongly
                   |variables wrongly considered|considered part of constant
                   |part of constant expressions|expressions


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5675


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/5675] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions
       [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
  2003-05-27  5:12 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-05-27 14:46 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-05-27 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5675


pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-05-27 14:38:13
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-05-27 14:38 -------
See Dara's comment.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/5675] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions
       [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
@ 2003-05-27  5:12 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
  2003-05-27 14:46 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-05-27  5:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5675



------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-05-27 05:09 -------
Hello,

This bug is confirmed to still exist on gcc 3.3 branch and mainline (20030525).

Dara



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-25  2:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm-gccbugs@polyomino.org.uk>
2004-08-11 20:50 ` [Bug c/5675] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-11 21:05 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-25  2:21 ` [Bug c/5675] [4.0 regression] " geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-25  2:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
2005-01-17 18:57 ` [Bug c/5675] " ian at airs dot com
2005-01-24  0:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-25  2:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <20020212134602.5675.jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
2003-05-27  5:12 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-05-27 14:46 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).