From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30755 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2004 20:11:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30746 invoked by uid 48); 13 Aug 2004 20:11:25 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040813201125.30745.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "danfuzz at milk dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040813164249.17019.danfuzz@milk.com> References: <20040813164249.17019.danfuzz@milk.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/17019] THUMB -O1: bad code generated for simple for loop X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg01301.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From danfuzz at milk dot com 2004-08-13 20:11 ------- I wrote: >Assuming that that is indeed the right pattern to match, then it looks like either there's a missing >case in the switch statement or the which_alternative variable got set incorrectly. I just checked, and it looks like which_alternative is 2 in this case, which is not one of the cases of the switch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17019