From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14076 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2004 05:26:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14068 invoked by uid 48); 15 Aug 2004 05:26:09 -0000 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 05:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040815052609.14067.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040726202816.16726.indukuru@us.ibm.com> References: <20040726202816.16726.indukuru@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/16726] [3.5 Regression] g++ Bug in Linux/PPC with altivec X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg01431.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-15 05:26 ------- Actually this is not a bug, you have to #undef bool after including altivec.h if you want to compile with bool as the normal meaning. This is mainly because we don't have context-sensitive keywords in GCC (except in Apple's GCC). -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Keywords| |rejects-valid Resolution| |INVALID Summary|g++ Bug in Linux/PPC with |[3.5 Regression] g++ Bug in |altivec |Linux/PPC with altivec http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16726