From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17768 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2004 06:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17756 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2004 06:07:26 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040816060726.17753.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "law at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040816015952.17044.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040816015952.17044.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/17044] [3.5 Regression] libgcc2.c:169: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg01502.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-08-16 06:07 ------- Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] libgcc2.c:169: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 22:18, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-16 04:18 ------- > Ok, after backporting the darwin fix, it turns out that the patch that > actually introduced the ICE noted in the summary is: > > 2004-08-09 Jeff Law Sigh. Can you send me a .i file so that I can take a looksie with a cross compiler? I won't have access to my HPs for at least another week. jeff -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17044