From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-107098-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25717 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2004 15:36:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25704 invoked by uid 48); 17 Aug 2004 15:36:51 -0000
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040817153651.25702.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040816190449.17051.green@redhat.com>
References: <20040816190449.17051.green@redhat.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/17051] [3.5 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed.for SSA_NAME: l_addr<D8610>_650
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg01678.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-08-17 15:36 -------
Andrew's guess seems correct. The regression appears with your patch, Richard:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-06/msg01253.html

Btw, here's an even shorter testcase.
Note that A.d isn't used at all. But removing it causes the test to pass.

=================================
struct A
{
    char c, d;
};

void foo(struct A *p)
{
    struct A a = *p;

    if (p->c)
        bar1(a);
    else
    {
        if (p) bar2(a,a.c);
        bar3(a.c);
    }
}
=================================


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17051