From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19995 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2004 16:01:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19962 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2004 16:01:54 -0000 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040817160154.19961.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040816214702.17053.dje@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040816214702.17053.dje@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/17053] [3.5 Regression] Repo functionality partially broken on AIX X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg01684.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-08-17 16:01 ------- Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] Repo functionality partially broken on AIX dje at watson dot ibm dot com wrote: >------- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2004-08-17 15:56 ------- >Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] Repo functionality partially broken on AIX > > I didn't know if gcc's behavior was correct. > I believe so, yes. Basically, it is being conservative about whether or not the template instantiation can throw, until it is sure. >If you agree that it >is, I will develop the fix for collect2.c so that you can concentrate on >other things. > Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17053