From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26948 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2004 17:38:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26927 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2004 17:38:08 -0000 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040817173808.26926.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040816015952.17044.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040816015952.17044.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/17044] [3.5 Regression] libgcc2.c:169: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg01697.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-08-17 17:38 ------- Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] libgcc2.c:169: internal c > John -- if this is a problem building libgcc2.i with the stage1 > compiler, can you send me a backtrace at the failure point (again, > I'm without access to my HPs for at least a week). The exception occurs in the following call to free: Breakpoint 13, 0x400000000031e350 in thread_block (bb=0x800003fffeacd8c0) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:381 381 free (rd); (gdb) bt #0 0x400000000031e350 in thread_block (bb=0x800003fffeacd8c0) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:381 #1 0x400000000031e418 in thread_through_all_blocks () at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:415 #2 0x40000000002daeb4 in tree_ssa_dominator_optimize () at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c:365 #3 0x40000000002205ac in execute_one_pass (pass=0x8000000100000f38) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-optimize.c:453 #4 0x40000000002206d8 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x8000000100000f38) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-optimize.c:478 #5 0x4000000000220718 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x8000000100000950) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-optimize.c:479 #6 0x4000000000220b74 in tree_rest_of_compilation ( fndecl=0x800003fffeaf3000, nested_p=0 '\0') at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-optimize.c:556 #7 0x40000000001285a4 in c_expand_body (fndecl=0x800003fffeaf3000) at ../../gcc/gcc/c-decl.c:6397 #8 0x40000000007f60c8 in cgraph_expand_function (node=0x800003fffeac6b60) at ../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:801 #9 0x40000000007f99c4 in cgraph_expand_all_functions () at ../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1673 #10 0x40000000007f9f8c in cgraph_optimize () at ../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1763 #11 0x4000000000129a78 in c_write_global_declarations () at ../../gcc/gcc/c-decl.c:6711 #12 0x4000000000734940 in compile_file () at ../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:989 #13 0x4000000000738194 in do_compile () at ../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:2060 #14 0x40000000007382a8 in toplev_main (argc=45, argv=0x800003fffeff0830) at ../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:2092 #15 0x40000000001d467c in main (argc=-2147482625, argv=0x800003fffeac85a0) at ../../gcc/gcc/main.c:35 Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17044