From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2505 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2004 12:43:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2495 invoked by uid 48); 19 Aug 2004 12:43:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040819124324.2494.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040629153633.16273.olivier.fourdan@regis-dgac.net> References: <20040629153633.16273.olivier.fourdan@regis-dgac.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/16273] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] Memory exhausted when using nested classes and virtual functions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg01916.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-19 12:43 ------- With minor corrections I could compile the unincluded testcase with basically the same memory usage as in comment #13: 130 MB for mainline, 190 MB for 3.4 branch. I even managed to compile it with -O2. That just added another 8MB. With 2.95.3 memory usage peeks at about 95 MB (-O and -O2). I think we can live with the 50% increase for such complex code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16273