public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug other/17101] New: Opportunity to collapse and eliminate loop
@ 2004-08-19 14:59 gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-19 15:06 ` [Bug other/17101] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-06 20:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/17101] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-19 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Description:
A non-optimal code sequence is illustraded. Duplicate using gcc 3.5 and
command line:
gcc -O3 -m64 -funroll-loops -c test.c
Testcase:
int st;
void foo ()
{
int i;
int j;
for (i=0; i < 10; i++)
for (j=0; j < 10; j++)
st = st + j;
}
Assembly:
Code currently generated collapses the outer loop, but not the inner loop:
.foo:
li 0,10
ld 11,.LC0@toc(2)
mtctr 0
.L2:
lwz 9,0(11)
addi 9,9,45
stw 9,0(11)
bdnz .L2
blr
Forward store motion could remove the stw from the loop and allow it to
be collapsed to look like this:
.foo:
ld 11,.LC0@toc(2)
lwz 3,0(11)
addi 9,3,450
stw 9,0(11)
blr
--
Summary: Opportunity to collapse and eliminate loop
Product: gcc
Version: 3.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: steinmtz at us dot ibm dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,steinmtz at us dot ibm
dot com
GCC build triplet: powerpc64-linux
GCC host triplet: powerpc64-linux
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17101
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/17101] Opportunity to collapse and eliminate loop
2004-08-19 14:59 [Bug other/17101] New: Opportunity to collapse and eliminate loop gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-19 15:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-06 20:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/17101] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-19 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-19 15:06 -------
Confirmed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-08-19 15:06:47
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17101
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/17101] Opportunity to collapse and eliminate loop
2004-08-19 14:59 [Bug other/17101] New: Opportunity to collapse and eliminate loop gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-19 15:06 ` [Bug other/17101] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-06 20:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-06 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-06 20:36 -------
Fixed on the mainline:
lis r9,ha16(_st)
lwa r2,lo16(_st)(r9)
addi r2,r2,450
stw r2,lo16(_st)(r9)
blr
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimization |tree-optimization
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17101
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-06 20:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-19 14:59 [Bug other/17101] New: Opportunity to collapse and eliminate loop gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-19 15:06 ` [Bug other/17101] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-06 20:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/17101] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).