From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-107619-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20471 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2004 08:47:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20464 invoked by uid 48); 22 Aug 2004 08:47:33 -0000
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:47:00 -0000
From: "jwm at csua dot berkeley dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20040822084730.17135.jwm@csua.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/17135] New: -freorder-functions mis-documented
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg02199.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

The manual reads:
-freorder-functions
    Reorder basic blocks in the compiled function in order to reduce number of
taken branches and improve code locality. 

This is the description of -freorder-blocks, and I believe -freorder-functions
should be something like: 
-freorder-functions

-- 
           Summary: -freorder-functions mis-documented
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: other
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: jwm at csua dot berkeley dot edu
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17135