From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6666 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2004 17:35:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6537 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2004 17:35:22 -0000 Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 17:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040822173522.6536.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040812163817.17005.jerrydy@sbcglobal.net> References: <20040812163817.17005.jerrydy@sbcglobal.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/17005] wide character strings don't work on HP-UX 11i using gcc 3.4.1 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg02214.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-08-22 17:35 ------- Subject: Re: wide character strings don't work on HP-UX 11i using gcc 3.4.1 John David Anglin wrote: >This is a work in progress. In one sense, the patch is complete >except for documenting the -munix= option. > First, thanks for your work: if I understand well, on 11.11, and default for -munix, we have obtained a clean wchar_t testsuite: great! > However, it's dangerous >to use other than default for this option. > > Unfortunately, I have trouble understanding the details of your concerns: hopefully, someone else will give you more meaningful advice. My naive impression is that the new, documented, default, cannot be really dangerous, by itself and the same for well documented new options. Also, if I understand well, those options (93, 95, that is) can only lead to a behavior similar to what we had before your patch... On the other hand, if this is not the case, in my opinion you could work on adding that possibility. Thanks again, Paolo. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17005