[Bug libfortran/16288] New: Failure of test direct_io.f90 on irix6.5

[Bug libfortran/16288] New: Failure of test direct_io.f90 on irix6.5

[billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org]

Test execute/direct_io.f90 execute fails on irix6.5.
This looks like a test harness problem.  Will investigate.

The test runs and the only output is "STOP 0"
Adding a print statement into the read loop, it looks like the
test is running OK.

-- 
           Summary: Failure of test direct_io.f90 on irix6.5
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libfortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu
                    dot org
 GCC build triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5
  GCC host triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5
GCC target triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288

[Bug libfortran/16288] Failure of test direct_io.f90 on irix6.5 with -64

[billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-06-30 01:58 -------
Actually this only fails with -mabi=64.  Passes with default -mabi=n32
but I didn't notice that minor detail/

The failure is:
At line 3 of file direct_io.f90
Fortran runtime error: Missing RECL parameter in OPEN statement

The offending line is:
       OPEN(UNIT=10,ACCESS='DIRECT',RECL=128)

This looks like a real bug so I will unassign self.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
            Summary|Failure of test             |Failure of test
                   |direct_io.f90 on irix6.5    |direct_io.f90 on irix6.5
                   |                            |with -64


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288

[Bug libfortran/16288] Failure of test direct_io.f90 on irix6.5 with -64

[tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-08-23 13:47 -------
This looks like a typical issue of library and compiler not being in sync, i.e.
either part having been updated without updating the other. Can you try updating
your whole tree, and then rebuilding again from scratch? It might be a real bug
of course, maybe some 32<->64 bit confusion.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288

[Bug libfortran/16288] Failure of test direct_io.f90 on irix6.5 with -64

[david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au]

------- Additional Comments From david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au  2004-08-23 23:08 -------
Subject: RE:  Failure of test direct_io.f90 on irix6.5 with -64

tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 
> 2004-08-23 13:47 ------- This looks like a typical issue of library
> and compiler not being in sync, i.e. either part having been updated
> without updating the other. Can you try updating 
> your whole tree, and then rebuilding again from scratch? It might be
> a real bug 
> of course, maybe some 32<->64 bit confusion.

This is with a clean tree.

__________________________________________________________________

NOTICE
 
This e-mail and any attachments are private and confidential and 
may contain privileged information
 
If you are not an authorised recipient, the copying or distribution 
of this e-mail and any attachments is prohibited and you must not 
read, print or act in reliance on this e-mail or attachments
 
This notice should not be removed
__________________________________________________________________


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288

[Bug libfortran/16288] Failure of test direct_io.f90 on irix6.5 with -64

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-24 00:52 -------
Is this still true?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288

[Bug libfortran/16288] Failure of test direct_io.f90 on irix6.5 with -64

[david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au]

------- Additional Comments From david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au  2004-11-24 00:58 -------
Subject: RE:  Failure of test direct_io.f90 on irix6.5 with -64

Still present Tue Nov 23 09:07:14 GMT 2004

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-11/msg01020.html


NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are private and confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an authorised recipient, the copying or distribution of this e-mail and any attachments is prohibited and you must not read, print or act in reliance on this e-mail or attachments.
This notice should not be removed.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288

[Bug libfortran/16288] Failure of test direct_io.f90 on irix6.5 with -64

[tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-05 19:39 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19194 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288