public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/17044] [3.5 Regression] libgcc2.c:169: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040824194804.19973.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040816015952.17044.danglin@gcc.gnu.org>


------- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com  2004-08-24 19:48 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.5 Regression] libgcc2.c:169:
	internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 11:38, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2004-08-17 17:38 -------
> Subject: Re:  [3.5 Regression] libgcc2.c:169: internal c
> 
> > John -- if this is a problem building libgcc2.i with the stage1
> > compiler, can you send me a backtrace at the failure point (again,
> > I'm without access to my HPs for at least a week).
> 
> The exception occurs in the following call to free:
> 
> Breakpoint 13, 0x400000000031e350 in thread_block (bb=0x800003fffeacd8c0)
>     at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:381
> 381           free (rd);
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x400000000031e350 in thread_block (bb=0x800003fffeacd8c0)
>     at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:381
OK.  That means there's got to be a memory management error of some
kind.  I wonder if we're freeing GC'd memory or something stupid like
that.



Jeff



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17044


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-24 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-16  1:59 [Bug middle-end/17044] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-16  2:03 ` [Bug middle-end/17044] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-16  2:11 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-08-16  4:18 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-16  6:07 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-08-16 14:40 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-17  5:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-17  5:44 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-08-17 16:27 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-08-17 17:38 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-08-17 20:49 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-08-18 15:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-24 19:48 ` law at redhat dot com [this message]
2004-08-24 20:00 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-08-24 20:04 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-08-24 20:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-24 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040824194804.19973.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).