public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/17044] [3.5 Regression] libgcc2.c:169: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:04:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20040824200432.10657.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20040816015952.17044.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> ------- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-08-24 20:04 ------- Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] libgcc2.c:169: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 14:00, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-08-24 20:00 ------- > Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] libgcc2.c:169: internal c > > > > The exception occurs in the following call to free: > > > > > > Breakpoint 13, 0x400000000031e350 in thread_block (bb=0x800003fffeacd8c0) > > > at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:381 > > > 381 free (rd); > > > (gdb) bt > > > #0 0x400000000031e350 in thread_block (bb=0x800003fffeacd8c0) > > > at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:381 > > OK. That means there's got to be a memory management error of some > > kind. I wonder if we're freeing GC'd memory or something stupid like > > that. > > That might be the case although I didn't actually determine how the > object was created. I know the fault occurred for i = 0 and all = false. > > One problem is that the varray is a local and it's created and > managed using VARRAY macros that use GC. There's also a missing > "struct" in the call to xcalloc. > > I have an alternate fix that uses NOGC macros and VARRAY_FREE if > it's preferable to use malloc for the allocation of the varray. Let's go with your original fix -- I really dislike the NOGC stuff. jeff > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17044
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-24 20:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-08-16 1:59 [Bug middle-end/17044] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-16 2:03 ` [Bug middle-end/17044] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-16 2:11 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-08-16 4:18 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-16 6:07 ` law at redhat dot com 2004-08-16 14:40 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-17 5:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-17 5:44 ` law at redhat dot com 2004-08-17 16:27 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-08-17 17:38 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-08-17 20:49 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-08-18 15:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-24 19:48 ` law at redhat dot com 2004-08-24 20:00 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-08-24 20:04 ` law at redhat dot com [this message] 2004-08-24 20:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-24 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20040824200432.10657.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).