* [Bug c++/16693] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
@ 2004-07-23 17:18 ` paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
2004-07-23 17:20 ` paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (16 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk @ 2004-07-23 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk 2004-07-23 17:18 -------
Created an attachment (id=6814)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6814&action=view)
Preprocessed output of the code in the defect report
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16693] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
2004-07-23 17:18 ` [Bug c++/16693] " paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
@ 2004-07-23 17:20 ` paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
2004-07-23 17:22 ` [Bug c++/16693] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk @ 2004-07-23 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |3.4.0 3.4.1
Known to work| |3.3.3 3.5.0
Summary|Bitwise AND is lost when |Bitwise AND is lost when
|used within a cast to an |used within a cast to an
|enum of the same precision |enum of the same precision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16693] [3.4 Regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
2004-07-23 17:18 ` [Bug c++/16693] " paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
2004-07-23 17:20 ` paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
@ 2004-07-23 17:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-23 19:04 ` [Bug c++/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] " bangerth at dealii dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-23 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Summary|Bitwise AND is lost when |[3.4 Regression] Bitwise AND
|used within a cast to an |is lost when used within a
|enum of the same precision |cast to an enum of the same
| |precision
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-23 17:22 ` [Bug c++/16693] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-23 19:04 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-07-23 19:06 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-07-23 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-07-23 19:04 -------
Confirmed. A regression in 3.4 and mainline against 3.3.4.
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-07-23 19:04:45
date| |
Summary|[3.4 Regression] Bitwise AND|[3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise
|is lost when used within a |AND is lost when used within
|cast to an enum of the same |a cast to an enum of the
|precision |same precision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-23 19:04 ` [Bug c++/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] " bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-07-23 19:06 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-07-24 0:10 ` paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (12 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-07-23 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-07-23 19:06 -------
BTW, my mainline snapshot from 2004-07-21 fails this testcase, too.
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail|3.4.0 3.4.1 |3.4.0 3.4.1 3.5.0
Known to work|3.3.3 3.5.0 |3.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-23 19:06 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-07-24 0:10 ` paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
2004-07-26 13:03 ` paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (11 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk @ 2004-07-24 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk 2004-07-24 00:10 -------
I've now tried this on SPARC as well as i686 and I get the same results which
suggests this is a front end rather than a target specific problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-24 0:10 ` paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
@ 2004-07-26 13:03 ` paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
2004-07-26 13:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk @ 2004-07-26 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk 2004-07-26 13:02 -------
A collegue has done some more investigation and come up with the following
additional constraints.
If the enum pushes into the top nibble then the problem does not occur.
A similar problem occurs with unsigned short where the problem occurs if the
enumeration fits into a byte.
If the target variable is an unsigned int rather than a unsigned char or short
the problem does not occur.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work|3.3.3 |3.3.3 3.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-26 13:03 ` paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
@ 2004-07-26 13:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-10 1:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-26 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-26 13:50 -------
I think this is caused by fold which does the following transformation:
(cast)(a & constant) -> ((cast)a) & ((cast)constant).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-26 13:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-10 1:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-10 9:05 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-10 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-10 1:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-10 9:05 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-19 21:31 ` [Bug middle-end/16693] " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-10 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-10 09:05 -------
Here's a condensed version (which should return 0):
=====================================
char foo()
{
return 0x10;
}
enum E { e = 0x0f };
int main()
{
return (char)(E)(e & foo());
}
=====================================
Btw, the bug only occurs with the C++ frontend and not with plain C.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Keywords| |monitored
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-10 9:05 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-19 21:31 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-20 9:33 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-19 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-19 21:31 -------
This is a duplicate of some other PR -- I'm just not sure which.
In C++, the compiler can assume that there will be no values of the enum greater
than 0xf, given the declaration. That is why the compiler omits the bitwise-and.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-19 21:31 ` [Bug middle-end/16693] " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-20 9:33 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-22 23:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-20 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-20 09:33 -------
The bitwise and is applied to something that isn't an enumerated type (it's
wider than that), and it's whole purpose is to reduce the value to something
that then *can* be cast to the enumerated type.
It's not as if the user had written
0xf & static_cast<Test_Enum>(ret6666(44));
Which would be incorrect.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-20 9:33 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-22 23:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-25 17:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-22 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-22 23:30 -------
I agree.
Roger, I think this is a problem in fold with this code:
/* Convert (T)(x & c) into (T)x & (T)c, if c is an integer
constants (if x has signed type, the sign bit cannot be set
in c). This folds extension into the BIT_AND_EXPR. */
if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
&& TREE_CODE (type) != BOOLEAN_TYPE
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0)) == BIT_AND_EXPR
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0), 1)) == INTEGER_CST)
The problem is that we turn:
(enum E) ((unsigned int) (expr) & 0xf)
into:
(E) (unsigned int) (expr) & (E) 0xf
which is not valid because "expr" may not be within the range of "E". (In this
case "E" has the range [0, 0xf].) The original code has a well-defined meaning;
the resulting code has an "unspecified" meaning according to the C++ standard.
I think this transformation is only safe if the values can be shown to be in
range, as would be the case if the TYPE_PRECISION of "E" was as big as that of
"unsigned int".
Therefore, I've assigned this bug to you.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |roger at eyesopen dot com
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |roger at eyesopen dot com
|dot org |
Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/16693] [3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-22 23:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-25 17:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-25 17:28 ` [Bug middle-end/16693] [3.5 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-25 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-25 17:22 -------
Subject: Bug 16693
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: sayle@gcc.gnu.org 2004-08-25 17:22:10
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog decl.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt: pr16372-1.C pr16693-1.C pr16693-2.C
Log message:
PR middle-end/16693
PR tree-optimization/16372
* decl.c (finish_enum): Make the precision of the enumerated type
the same width as the underlying integer type.
* g++.dg/opt/pr16372-1.C: New test case.
* g++.dg/opt/pr16693-1.C: New test case.
* g++.dg/opt/pr16693-2.C: New test case.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.3892.2.153&r2=1.3892.2.154
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.1174.2.22&r2=1.1174.2.23
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.3389.2.260&r2=1.3389.2.261
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr16372-1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr16693-1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr16693-2.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/16693] [3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-25 17:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-25 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-25 20:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-25 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work|3.3.3 3.3.4 |3.3.3 3.3.4 3.4.2
Summary|[3.4/3.5 regression] Bitwise|[3.5 regression] Bitwise AND
|AND is lost when used within|is lost when used within a
|a cast to an enum of the |cast to an enum of the same
|same precision |precision
Target Milestone|3.4.2 |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/16693] [3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-25 17:28 ` [Bug middle-end/16693] [3.5 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-25 20:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-25 20:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-26 12:33 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-25 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-25 20:51 -------
Subject: Bug 16693
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: sayle@gcc.gnu.org 2004-08-25 20:51:02
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog decl.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt: pr16372-1.C pr16693-1.C pr16693-2.C
Log message:
PR middle-end/16693
PR tree-optimization/16372
* decl.c (finish_enum): Make the precision of the enumerated type
the same width as the underlying integer type.
* g++.dg/opt/pr16372-1.C: New test case.
* g++.dg/opt/pr16693-1.C: New test case.
* g++.dg/opt/pr16693-2.C: New test case.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4308&r2=1.4309
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1278&r2=1.1279
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4192&r2=1.4193
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr16372-1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr16693-1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr16693-2.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/16693] [3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-25 20:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-25 20:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-26 12:33 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-25 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-25 20:58 -------
Fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/16693] [3.5 regression] Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision
2004-07-23 17:15 [Bug c++/16693] New: Bitwise AND is lost when used within a cast to an enum of the same precision paulg at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-25 20:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-26 12:33 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-26 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-26 12:33 -------
Milestone update for release note extraction.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail|3.4.0 3.4.1 3.5.0 |3.4.0 3.4.1
Known to work|3.3.3 3.3.4 3.4.2 |3.3.3 3.3.4 3.4.2 3.5.0
Target Milestone|3.5.0 |3.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread