public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/15865] [DR 147] Invalid variable definition through the constructor name Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:21:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20040827012107.24290.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20040608021123.15865.giovannibajo@libero.it> ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-08-27 01:21 ------- That is misleading, DR 147 clarifies this. It adds this paragraph to [class.qual]: If the nested-name-specifier nominates a class C, and the name specified after the nested-name-specifier, when looked up in C, is the injected-class-name of C (clause _class_), the name is instead considered to name the constructor of class C. Such a constructor name shall be used only in the declarator-id of a constructor definition that appears outside of the class definition. [Example: struct A { A(); }; struct B: public A { B(); }; A::A() { } B::B() { } B::A ba; // object of type A A::A a; // error, A::A is not a type name --end example] See also testsuite/g++.dg/tc1/dr147.C (xfailed). -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | Summary|Invalid variable definition |[DR 147] Invalid variable |through the constructor name|definition through the | |constructor name http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15865
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-27 1:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-06-08 2:11 [Bug c++/15865] New: " giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-06-08 2:29 ` [Bug c++/15865] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-29 17:20 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-08-17 17:11 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-27 1:09 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-08-27 1:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-27 1:21 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it [this message] 2004-08-27 1:23 ` [Bug c++/15865] [DR 147] " giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-08-27 1:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20040827012107.24290.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).