public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/17209] New: ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096)
@ 2004-08-27 8:10 dank at kegel dot com
2004-08-27 8:11 ` [Bug target/17209] " dank at kegel dot com
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2004-08-27 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Building glibc's locale/programs/ld-collate.c causes failures with some arm
targets.
The errors seem to be in the last function, which is 1200 lines long.
Exactly which ones depends a bit on exactly what version you're building.
This happens with several versions of glibc (2.2.5, 2.3.3-20040822)
and with several variants of CPU type (e.g. even plain arm supposedly may
trigger it; see http://www.handhelds.org/hypermail/kernel-discuss/0/0066.html)
It happened with gcc-3.4.0 (see
http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.28-rc26/buildlogs/0.28/arm-softfloat-gcc-3.4.0-glibc-2.2.5.txt)
and again with gcc-3.4.1. I'll attach a preprocessed input file.
--
Summary: ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset
(4096)
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dank at kegel dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: arm-xscale-linux-gnu, other arm variants
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17209
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/17209] ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096)
2004-08-27 8:10 [Bug target/17209] New: ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096) dank at kegel dot com
@ 2004-08-27 8:11 ` dank at kegel dot com
2004-08-31 5:41 ` dank at kegel dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2004-08-27 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2004-08-27 08:11 -------
Created an attachment (id=6995)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6995&action=view)
preprocessed output of ld-collate.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17209
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/17209] ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096)
2004-08-27 8:10 [Bug target/17209] New: ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096) dank at kegel dot com
2004-08-27 8:11 ` [Bug target/17209] " dank at kegel dot com
@ 2004-08-31 5:41 ` dank at kegel dot com
2004-10-06 0:20 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2004-08-31 5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2004-08-31 05:41 -------
Looks similar to PR16201, though this is C and that is C++...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17209
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/17209] ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096)
2004-08-27 8:10 [Bug target/17209] New: ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096) dank at kegel dot com
2004-08-27 8:11 ` [Bug target/17209] " dank at kegel dot com
2004-08-31 5:41 ` dank at kegel dot com
@ 2004-10-06 0:20 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-06 6:41 ` dank at kegel dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-06 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-06 00:20 -------
Exactly what options were passed to which compiler with the attached test case?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17209
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/17209] ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096)
2004-08-27 8:10 [Bug target/17209] New: ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096) dank at kegel dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-06 0:20 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-06 6:41 ` dank at kegel dot com
2004-10-06 6:46 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-01-31 15:58 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2004-10-06 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2004-10-06 06:41 -------
I only had to pass -O. It doesn't happen without -O,
and it doesn't happen with -O2 (at least in this case).
If you'd like to see it in action in a larger testcase
with gcc-3.4.2, here's how:
wget http://kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.28-rc37.tar.gz
tar -xzvf crosstool-0.28-rc37.tar.gz
cd crosstool-0.28-rc37
sudo mkdir /opt/crosstool
sudo chown $USER /opt/crosstool
sh demo-pr17209.sh
I currently see the bug when building several versions
of glibc for several flavors of ARM.
It's 100% repeatable, but whether the bug bites
depends on the details of the program being compiled, so
not all combinations of ARM target and glibc version
are affected.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17209
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/17209] ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096)
2004-08-27 8:10 [Bug target/17209] New: ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096) dank at kegel dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-06 6:41 ` dank at kegel dot com
@ 2004-10-06 6:46 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-01-31 15:58 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2004-10-06 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2004-10-06 06:46 -------
You can also see log tails of the problem in action at
http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.28-rc37/buildlogs/0.28/
Five of the arm gcc-3.4.2 failures there are due to this
problem. (The other three are due to an ICE in flow.c:3257.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17209
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/17209] ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096)
2004-08-27 8:10 [Bug target/17209] New: ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096) dank at kegel dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-06 6:46 ` dank at kegel dot com
@ 2005-01-31 15:58 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-31 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-31 15:55 -------
This is indeed a duplicate of PR16201
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16201 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17209
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-31 15:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-27 8:10 [Bug target/17209] New: ld-collate.s: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096) dank at kegel dot com
2004-08-27 8:11 ` [Bug target/17209] " dank at kegel dot com
2004-08-31 5:41 ` dank at kegel dot com
2004-10-06 0:20 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-06 6:41 ` dank at kegel dot com
2004-10-06 6:46 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-01-31 15:58 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).