public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/17237] New: inefficient parameter passing on x86
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 05:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040830055803.17237.dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> (raw)

Compiling:
unsigned long long LLD(unsigned long long arg1, unsigned long long arg2)
{
  return arg1 /  arg2;
}

with gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer generates:
        subl    $28, %esp
        movl    40(%esp), %eax
        movl    44(%esp), %edx
        movl    %eax, 8(%esp)
        movl    32(%esp), %eax
        movl    %edx, 12(%esp)
        movl    36(%esp), %edx
        movl    %eax, (%esp)
        movl    %edx, 4(%esp)
        call    __udivdi3
        addl    $28, %esp
        ret

which is 48 bytes.

The ICC generated code is 28 bytes:

        pushl     16(%esp)                                      #521.17
        pushl     16(%esp)                                      #521.17
        pushl     16(%esp)                                      #521.17
        pushl     16(%esp)                                      #521.17
        call      __udivdi3                                     #521.17
        addl      $16, %esp                                     #521.17
        ret                                                     #521.17

-- 
           Summary: inefficient parameter passing on x86
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: rtl-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17237


             reply	other threads:[~2004-08-30  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-30  5:58 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu [this message]
2004-10-06 23:36 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/17237] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-07  0:05 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2004-10-07  0:26 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/17237] inefficient parameter passing on x86 (useless stack space allocated) giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-07  0:26 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/17237] inefficient parameter passing on x86 giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-07 19:55 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/17237] inefficient parameter passing on x86 (useless stack space allocated) rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-07 19:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040830055803.17237.dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).