public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/17232] classes and class template specializations treated differently w.r.t. core issue #337
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040830160526.19749.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040829175551.17232.cludwig@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-08-30 16:05 -------
So do we agree that the problem in this PR is really this:
- for the non-template, the compiler realizes that B is abstract
and that therefore no array type can exist; it therefore rejects
the template version of g and goes with the general one
- for the template class A, the compiler doesn't realize the
abstractness and therefore goes with the template version of g
Is this indeed the reason the testcase fails? I double-checked that
if I remove the '=0' declaration in the two classes, that the testcase
really succeeds.
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17232
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-29 17:55 [Bug c++/17232] New: " cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-08-29 17:58 ` [Bug c++/17232] " cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-08-29 18:42 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-08-29 18:57 ` cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-08-30 12:30 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-30 13:22 ` cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-08-30 14:47 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-30 16:05 ` bangerth at dealii dot org [this message]
2004-08-30 16:56 ` cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-08-30 20:10 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-30 20:56 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-08-30 22:12 ` jason at redhat dot com
2004-08-30 23:15 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-09-06 7:03 ` cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-09-06 13:40 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-09-06 13:43 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-09-27 12:02 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
[not found] <bug-17232-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-02-27 18:03 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-17 2:37 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-17 20:32 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-23 17:08 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-09 1:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-16 13:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040830160526.19749.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).